Abstract:BackgroundCraniofacial skeletal discrepancies have been associated with upper airway dimensions.ObjectiveTo identify differences in upper airway volume across different sagittal and vertical skeletal patterns.Search methodsUnrestricted literature searches in eight databases/registers for human studies until May 2023.Selection criteriaCross-sectional studies measuring upper airway volumes using three-dimensional imaging in healthy patients of different sagittal (Class I, Class II, and Class III) or vertical (normodivergent, hypodivergent, and hyperdivergent) craniofacial morphology.Data collection and analysisDuplicate independent study selection, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment. Random-effects frequentist network meta-analysis was performed followed by subgroup-analyses and assessment of the quality of clinical recommendations (confidence in effect estimates) with the CINeMA (Confidence in Network Meta-Analysis) approach.ResultsSeventy publications pertaining to 66 unique studies were included with 56 studies (5734 patients) contributing to meta-analyses. Statistically significant differences were found for total pharyngeal airway volume, with Class II having decreased airway volume (−2256.06 mm 3 ; 95% Confidence Interval [CI] −3201.61 to −1310.51 mm 3 ) and Class III increased airway volume (1098.93 mm 3 ; 95% CI 25.41 to 2172.45 mm 3 ) compared to Class I. Significant airway volume reductions for Class II were localized mostly at the oropharynx, followed by the palatopharynx, and the glossopharynx. Significant airway volume increases for Class III were localized mostly at the oropharynx, followed by the intraoral cavity, and hypopharynx. Statistically significant differences according to vertical skeletal configuration were seen only for the oropharynx, where hyperdivergent patients had reduced volumes compared to normodivergent patients (−1716.77 mm 3 ; 95% CI −3296.42 to −137.12 mm 3 ). Airway differences for Class II and Class III configurations (compared to Class I) were more pronounced in adults than in children and the confidence for all estimates was very low according to CINeMA.ConclusionsConsiderable differences in upper airway volume were found between sagittal and vertical skeletal configurations. However, results should be interpreted with caution due to the high risk of bias, owing to the retrospective study design, inconsistencies in anatomic compartment boundaries used, samples of mixed children–adult patients, and incomplete reporting.Clinical Trial RegistrationPROSPERO (CRD42022366928).

Three-dimensional analysis of upper airway in the adolescents with different vertical skeletal patterns by Cone-Beam CT image

A three dimensional study of upper airway in adult skeletal Class II patients with different vertical growth patterns

Three-Dimensional Evaluation of the Upper Airway in Children of Skeletal Class Iii

Measurements of Normal Upper Airway Assessed by 3-Dimensional Computed Tomography in Chinese Children and Adolescents

A CBCT Analysis of Influencing Factors on the Upper Airway in Children

Three-dimensional airway evaluation in 387 subjects from one university orthodontic clinic using cone beam computed tomography

Three-dimensional Analysis of Upper Airway Morphology in Skeletal Class III Patients with and Without Mandibular Asymmetry.

Study of Upper Airway form and Hyoid Position of the Children with Different Vertical Facial Types in Mixed Dentition

Analysis of Maxillary Arch Morphology and Its Relationship with Upper Airway in Mouth Breathing Subjects with Different Sagittal Growth Patterns

[Relationship Between Upper Airway and Cranial-Facial Growth Patterns in Adolescents with Normal Occlusion].

Three-Dimensional Assessment of Upper Airway Volume and Morphology in Patients with Different Sagittal Skeletal Patterns

Do patients with different craniofacial patterns have differences in upper airway volume? A systematic review with network meta-analysis

Chin Morphology in Subjects with Different Vertical Skeletal Craniofacial Pattern

Study on the correlation between the structure of TMJ and vertical craniofaciai pattern, occlusion in Class Ⅱ1 Children

Upper airway form and hyoid position of the adults with different vertical facial types

Retrospective analysis of the upper airway anatomy and Sella turcica morphology across different skeletal malocclusions: a computerized technique

Three-dimensional Evaluation of Pharyngeal Airway and Maxillary Arch in Mouth and Nasal Breathing Children with Skeletal Class I and II

Correlation between the three-dimensional hyoid bone parameters and pharyngeal airway dimensions in different sagittal and vertical malocclusions

A comparison study of upper airway among different skeletal craniofacial patterns in nonsnoring Chinese children.

Comparison of mandibular cross-sectional morphology between Class I and Class II subjects with different vertical patterns: based on CBCT images and statistical shape analysis

Cephalometric analysis of chin soft tissue on Angle Class Ⅱ1 malocclusion with different vertical skeletal craniofacial patterns