Macular Choroidal Thickness in Patients of Diabetic Retinopathy
朱岩,汪军,孟忻,辛晨,高新晓,刘广峰,贾宇颂,王华
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.1005-1015.2014.02.004
2014-01-01
Abstract:Objective To analyze the choroidal thickness (CT) in patients of diabetic retinopathy (DR).Methods A total of 33 DR patients (43 eyes) were enrolled in this study,including 16 males (20 eyes) and 17 females (23 eyes).They were divided non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy (NPDR) without macular edema (ME) group (NPDR CSME-group,16 eyes),and NPDR with ME group (NPDR CSME + group,27 eyes) in accordance with international DR staging standard.The control group included healthy volunteers (age> 45 years) and hypertension patients with well-controlled blood pressure and normal fundus,totally 11 subjects (11 eyes).There was no significant difference between these 3 groups for gender,age,laterality,spherical equivalent degrees (x2 =0.562,F=0.580,x2=0.129,F=0.421; P>0.05).The CT and foveal retinal thickness were measured by Topcon 3D optical coherence tomography (OCT) 1000 at 11 locations,including subfoveal,5 locations (500,1000,1500,2000,2500 μm from the foveal) at the nasal or temporal side horizontally.Results The CT was significant thinner for NPDR CSME + group than control group at 8 locations (subfoveal,T0.5 mm, T1.0 T1.5 T2.0 mm,T2.5 mm, N0.5 mm,N1.smm) (F=3.459,4.605,5.997,9.096,9.777,11.563,3.765,3.339; P<0.05),but not at the other 3 locations (N1.0mm,N2.0mm,N2.5 mm) (F=2.889,3.157,2.194; P>0.05).The CT was the same between NPDR CSME-group and control group (F=2.194,3.157,3.339,2.889,3.765,3.459,4.605,5.997,9.096,9.777,11.563; P>0.05).The CT was significant different (F=11.563,9.777,9.096; P<0.05) between NPDR CSME-group and NPDR CSME+ group at 3 locations (T2.5 mm, T2.0 T1.5 mm),but not other locations (F=2.194,3.157,3.339,2.889,3.765,3.459,4.605,5.997; P>0.05).Correlation analysis showed that in the control group (r=-0.096),NPDR CSME-group (r=0.026) and NPDR CSME+ group (r=-0.067) subfoveal CT and foveal retinal thickness was not correlated (P>0.05).Conclusion NPDR macular edema patients have a thinner macular CT than control.