[Study on Cushioning and Energy Absorption of Sports Mouthguard].
Shi-Jie Bao,Sheng-Jia Ye,Xiao-Wei Ren,Qu-Yi Chen,Bin Wei,Yao Gong
DOI: https://doi.org/10.19439/j.sjos.2021.01.011
2021-01-01
Abstract:PURPOSE:Using impact test to study cushioning and energy absorption of sports mouthguard of different thickness, material and combination.METHODS:According to the thickness, material and combination, the mouthguards were divided into 7 groups with 6 testing pieces in each group. A pendulum device was used to apply impact energy to the mouthguard and dentition model, and the magnitude of the impact energy was measured by changing the release height of the pendulum. The force sensor and the laser vibrometer were respectively connected to the data acquisition and signal analyzer to obtain the incident speed, rebound speed, maximum collision force, collision start time and collision end time of the hammer head. Collision time, energy absorption and energy absorption ratio of the mouthguard were calculated, which reflected different mouthguard cushioning and energy absorption characteristics. One-way analysis of variance and t test in SPSS 22.0 software package was used to analyze the difference between different groups.RESULTS:No matter what type of mouthguard was worn by the dentition model, the impact force was significantly reduced than without mouthguards. At the same height, there was significant difference between the average maximum collision force and the average collision time among soft mouthguards with thicknesses of 2, 3, 4, and 5 mm(P<0.05); among which the average maximum collision force of the 5 mm was the smallest and the average collision time was the shortest. There was no significant difference in the average energy absorption and the average energy absorption ratio among these 4 groups. There was significant difference in the average maximum collision force, average collision time, average energy absorption and average energy absorption ratio between the two groups of mouthguards with the same thickness of splints and different materials(P<0.05). Among them, the average maximum impact force of the 4 mm soft mouthguard was smaller and the average collision time was longer.CONCLUSIONS:Wearing sports mouthguard can reduce the risk of tooth fracture during collision. Soft mouthguard has the best cushioning performance and it is positively related to thickness. Locally strengthening hard materials can enhance energy absorption and provide better protection.