Bivalent histone modifications during tooth development
Zheng, Li-Wei,Zhang, Bin-Peng,Xu, Ruo-Shi,Xu, Xin,Ye, Ling,Zhou, Xue-Dong
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ijos.2014.60
IF: 24.897
2014-01-01
International Journal of Oral Science
Abstract:Histone methylation is one of the most widely studied post-transcriptional modifications. It is thought to be an important epigenetic event that is closely associated with cell fate determination and differentiation. To explore the spatiotemporal expression of histone H3 lysine 4 trimethylation (H3K4me3) and histone H3 lysine 27 trimethylation (H3K27me3) epigenetic marks and methylation or demethylation transferases in tooth organ development, we measured the expression of SET7, EZH2, KDM5B and JMJD3 via immunohistochemistry and quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) analysis in the first molar of BALB/c mice embryos at E13.5, E15.5, E17.5, P0 and P3, respectively. We also measured the expression of H3K4me3 and H3K27me3 with immunofluorescence staining. During murine tooth germ development, methylation or demethylation transferases were expressed in a spatial–temporal manner. The bivalent modification characterized by H3K4me3 and H3K27me3 can be found during the tooth germ development, as shown by immunofluorescence. The expression of SET7, EZH2 as methylation transferases and KDM5B and JMJD3 as demethylation transferases indicated accordingly with the expression of H3K4me3 and H3K27me3 respectively to some extent. The bivalent histone may play a critical role in tooth organ development via the regulation of cell differentiation. Maps of chromosomal modifications could help scientists to better understand the timing and organization of tooth development. Chromosomal DNA is arranged around proteins called histones, which can be chemically modified at different sites. These modifications can boost or suppress gene activity, and researchers led by Xue-Dong Zhou of Sichuan University set out to examine their involvement in tooth formation. They examined two different histone modifications, one activating and one suppressing, at five different time-points in pulp and enamel development. They found that many sites in the young tooth exhibit both modifications, a state believed to prime cells to respond rapidly to developmental signals. Indeed, immature cells showed gene-activating modifications while more developed enamel and pulp cells tended to show inhibitory modifications. Closer examination of these patterns could lead to a more detailed timeline of tooth development.