The investigation of the optimal treatment timing of CICE appliance for class Ⅱ malocclusion

Xue TIAN,Jun HAN,Lifang DING,Wenhao ZHENG,Xiaoli YUAN,Lili CHEN
DOI: https://doi.org/10.13591/j.cnki.kqyx.2017.03.008
2017-01-01
Abstract:Objective To investigate the optimal treatment timing of CICE appliance for the treatment of class Ⅱ malocclusion with mandibular growth deficiency according to Quantitative Cervical Vertebral Maturation(QCVM).Methods 60 cases who were treated in the Department of Orthodontics, Oral and Medical Center, Wuhan Union Hospital, from June 2013 to January 2015 of Class Ⅱ malocclusion (an average age of 12.5 years old) with normal maxilla and retruded mandible were selected and the patients were divided into three groups Ⅰ(acceleration phase)-Ⅱ(fastigium)-Ⅲ(deceleration phase) according to QCVM.For each group, there were 20 patients(24 male and 36 female in total) and mandibular protraction was achieved with CICE appliance for 6 months;then fixed orthodontic treatment was carried out when the mandible and maxillary returned to their normal sagittal relation.Cephalometric analysis was compared before and after treatment.Results After 6 months of CICE appliance therapy, harmany profile and remarkable advancement of the mandible were obtained in all of these cases.Class Ⅱ occlusions were changed to Class Ⅰ relationship.During QCVM Ⅱ, the skeletal parameters were changed more significantly than dental parameters before and after treatment.The order of the parameters variation in different QCVM groups was QCVM Ⅱ>QCVM Ⅰ>QCVM Ⅲ.Conclusion CICE appliance for the treatment of class Ⅱ malocclusion is comfortable, invisible, concise, efficient, but the optimal treatment timing of mandibular protraction is also significant.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?