CT imaging features of congenital external auditory canal stenosis based on Matlab software

Dong-ming YIN,Lin YANG,Tian-yu ZHANG,Pei-dong DAI
DOI: https://doi.org/10.14166/j.issn.1671-2420.2017.03.003
2017-01-01
Abstract:Objective To investigate the characteristics of congenital aural stenosis (CAS) patients' external auditory canal (EAC) (shape,position,length,orientation) and to compare them with normal EAC.Methods The study included two groups.The stenosis group covered 27 patients (30 ears) with CAS;the normal group composed of 2 healthy people and the normal sides of 9 cases with lateral CAS and 25 cases with lateral external auditory atresia (totally 38 ears).All CT images were imported into Mimics software.The coordinates of EAC-related landmarks were obtained.Then the Matlab program could calculate some anatomic parameters about EAC,including distances from central point of tympanic annulus (CA),central point of osseous EAC opening (CO),central point of cartilaginous EAC inside opening (CCi),central point of cartilaginous EAC outside opening (CCo) to the Frankfurt horizontal plane (Pfrkt),the median sagittal plane (Psag),the coronal plane (Pcor);radius,curvature,angle,arc length of EAC bendings;orientations of EAC bendings;straight and arc lengths of EAC.Results Distances from CA,CO,CCi and CCo to Pfrkt were all shorter in CAS group than in the control group (P < 0.05).The arc and straight lengths of cartilaginous EAC in CAS group [(10.64±2.31) cm,(10.13 ±2.16) cm]were shorter than in the control group [(13.05 ±1.66) mm,(12.05 ±1.43) mm] (P<0.05).The total arc and straight lengths of EAC were shorter in CAS group than those in the control group (P < 0.05).The proportion of two bendings in cartilaginous EAC in the control group was significantly lower than that in CAS group (P < 0.05).Orientations of EAC bendings in CAS group differed from those in the control group (P <0.05).Conclusions Addition to smaller diameters,compared with normal EAC,the position of CAS patients' osseous EAC was higher.There was one bending in the CAS patients' cartilaginous EAC,but the cartilaginous EAC was more downward slanting.The total lengths of EAC and the length of cartilaginous EAC in CAS group were shorter than those in the control group,but there was no significant difference between CAS patients and normal people in osseous length of EAC.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?