Abstract:Aims An in vitro evaluation of the marginal adaptation of four root canal sealer variants at the dentin-sealer and sealer gutta-percha interfaces in the coronal, middle, and apical thirds of root canals was conducted using field emission scanning electron microscope (FESEM) analysis. Materials and methods In total, 80 extracted human mandibular premolar teeth were used in this study. All teeth were decoronated to standardize the root length to 14 mm. A round bur was used to gain access into canal orifices and the working length was determined. Root canal instrumentation was performed using the crown-down technique with ProTaper Next rotary files up to size X3, along with the use of root canal irrigants. All specimens were then randomly divided into four groups, with 20 specimens per group, depending on the root canal sealer used: Group A consisted of AH Plus (Dentsply Maillefer, Ballaigues, Switzerland), Group B of MTA-Fillapex (Angelus Dental, Londrina, Brazil), Group C of Bio-C Sealer (Angelus Dental), and Group D of GuttaFlow-2 (Coltene Whaledent, Altstatten, Switzerland). All specimens were obturated with size X3 gutta-percha points uniformly coated with respective sealers in the single-cone technique and coronal access was sealed with glass ionomer cement. The specimens were incubated for seven days and then horizontally sectioned at the coronal, middle, and apical thirds of the root canals. On each sample obtained, three points were randomly chosen and both sealer-dentin and sealer gutta-percha interfaces were examined under FESEM at 1000x magnification. The marginal gaps of all four sealers at both interfaces and at three levels of root canals were measured in µm and values were recorded, tabulated, and used for data analysis. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and post hoc Bonferroni tests were used for statistical analysis. A p-value ≤ 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results Compared to the sealer gutta-percha interface, AH Plus, MTA-Fillapex, and Bio-C sealers at all three levels of the root canals showed more marginal gaps at the sealer-dentin interface with a significant difference (p<0.05). However, the GuttaFlow-2 sealer showed no significant difference (P > 0.05). Conclusions The marginal adaptation of the GuttaFlow-2 sealer is superior to both dentin and gutta-percha at the coronal, middle, and apical thirds of root canals compared to other sealers used in the study.

A Vitro Study on the Apical Sealing Ability of Coronal Preflaring and Different Taper Gutta Percha Obturation

Effects of Two Different Root Canal Preparation and Two Different Sealers on Apical Microleakage

Evaluation of Apical Overfilling and Sealing with 4 Different Obturation Techniques in Oval-root Canals In Vitro

[Periapical Microleakage of Root Canals Filled with Four Kinds of Sealers Using Two Obturation Techniques].

Effects of different tapered gutta-percha cones with cold lateral condensation technique on apical seal

Photomicrographic evaluation of the apical sealing capacity of three types of gutta-percha master cones: an in vitro study

Comparison sealing ability in three bioceramic sealers applied in hydraulic condensation technique by using micro-computed tomography

Study on apical sealing ability of iRoot SP root canal sealer with single-cone obtruation technique

In vitro comparative evaluation of apical leakage using a bioceramic sealer with three different obturating techniques: A glucose leakage model

An in vitro study of apical and coronal sealing ability of resinified root canals

Evaluation of the Sealing Ability and Bond Strength of Two Endodontic Root Canal Sealers: An In Vitro Study

A comparison of the apical sealing ability of two root canal sealers with single-cone obturation technique in oval shaped root canals

An in Vitro Evaluation of Coronal Microleakage of Five Temporary Restorative Materials Used in Endodontic Access Cavities

Evaluation of the interface between gutta-percha and two types of sealers using scanning electron microscopy (SEM)

Evaluation of Apical Leakage After Root Canal Obturation with Glass Ionomer, Resin, and Zinc Oxide Eugenol Sealers Combined with Thermafil

Field Emission Scanning Electron Microscope Analysis of the Marginal Adaptation of Various Root Canal Sealers at the Dentin-Sealer and Sealer-Guttapercha Interfaces at Three Root Canal Levels: An In Vitro Study

Experimental Research of Effect of Removal of the Smear Layer on Apical Microleakage

Apical placement of needle tip with an injection-thermoplasticized gutta-percha technique for root canal obturation

Comparison of sealing ability of bioceramic sealer, AH plus, and guttaflow in conservatively prepared curved root canals obturated with single-cone technique: An In vitro study

Sealing ability and obturation quality of root canals filled with gutta-percha and two different sealers

Comparative evaluation of sealing ability of three bioactive obturation materials: A bacterial leakage study