Assessment of swallowing movement in Class Ⅱ malocclusion of adolescents with mandibular deficiency

Liyu Hou,Weiran Li
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.1674-5760.2016.03.001
2016-01-01
Abstract:Objective To investigate the influence of sagittal deformity on swallowing by studying the electromyography and kinesiograph of Angle Class Ⅰ and Class Ⅱ adolescents during swallowing.Methods The study sample consisted of 29 Class Ⅱ adolescents with mandibular deficiency as the Class Ⅱ group and 28 Class Ⅰ adolescents as the control group.During their swallowing movement,electromyograms of bilateral anterior temporalis,masseter and mentalis muscles were measured and mandibular range of motion was examined.Then,the two groups were compared.Results 1.The activity of right anterior temporalis (3.2(1.7,4.4) μV) in the Class Ⅱ group was less than that in control group (5.0(2.7,12.9) μV).Meanwhile the activity of bilateral masseter muscles in the Class Ⅱ group (right 3.2(2.2,5.7) μV/left 3.1(1.9,4.8) μV) was less than that in the control group (right 5.6(3.1,9.7) μV /left 4.7(2.6,9.8) μV).However,the activity of mentalis muscles in the Class Ⅱ group (right 22.1(15.2,40.1) μV/left 21.9(13.1,36.9) μV) was greater than that in the control group(right13.7(7.3,20.7) μV/left10.8(7.0,22.8) μV).2.At swallowing position,the vertical (Class Ⅱ group 1.2(0.3,2.0) mm> control group 0.5(0.2,1.0) mm) and horizontal (Class Ⅱ group 0.4(0.2,0.7) rnm > control group 0.2(0.1,0.3) mm) deviations of the mandible of the Class Ⅱ group were greater than the control group.The sagittal deviation in Class Ⅱ group (-0.4(-1.1,0.3) mm) was more forward than control group 0.1 (-0.1,0.4) mrn.During swallowing movement,the vertical (Class Ⅱ group 1.6(1.1,3.0) mm>control group 1.0(0.5,1.6) mm),horizontal (Class Ⅱ group 0.3(0.1,0.8) mm> control group 0.1(0.0,0.2) mm) displacements of mandible were greater in the Class Ⅱ group.The sagittal displacement in Class Ⅱ group (-0.4(-1.8,0.5) mm) was more forward than control group (0.0 (-0.3,0.4) mm).Conclusions In comparison with Class 1 patients,Class Ⅱ adolescents have a higher prevalence of lip incompetence and abnormal swallowing pattern.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?