Abstract:Background: Partially sighted often experience problems in orientation in public areas. Individual visual aids can only be used with limitations. Improving light intensity and colour contrasts of timetables, information signs, direction symbols, etc. can provide remedies. Experimentally substantiated directives do not yet exist. Patients and methods: Experiments were conducted in 231 partially sighted subjects (binocular vision < 0.3) diagnosed as experiencing dullness when watching the media, having maculopathies, glaucomas, or dystrophic alterations of the retina or choroid, and in 43 normal subjects to determine the subjective assessment of colour and light-intensity contrasts. The presented contrast patterns were Hartmann-characters as infield (3.3 degrees) with a rectangular surround (19.5 degrees x 14.3 degrees). Three experimental series were carried out in which subjects assigned 14 non-coloured/non-coloured contrasts, 35 non-coloured/colour contrasts and 30 colour/colour contrasts to any of the five assessment classes of extremely poor, poor, optimal, sharp, extremely sharp. The colour contrasts consisted of combinations of yellow, green, red, purple, blue, and non-coloured. Results: For non-coloured/non-coloured, the subjects preferred positive contrasts (bright infield, dark surround). Preferred contrast levels were 0.91 to 0.99 for positive contrasts and -0.96 to -0.99 for negative contrasts. For colour/non-coloured contrasts, 90% of the partially sighted preferred yellow as the foreground colour with a contrast level above 0.89. For colour/colour contrasts, optimal assessments of 90% of all partially sighted were yellow/purple and yellow/blue with contrast levels above 0.90. The determined results are applicable for the exact experimental contrast settings only. A field manual was prepared for planning and design of contrasts suited for the partially sighted in public areas. Conclusions: Partially sighted, in subjective contrasts assessment, prefer bright characters of signs on a dark background for both non-coloured and colour contrasts with contrast levels above 0.9. Yellow was the preferred infield colour.

Contrast sensitivity tests and its clinical application

The Mars Numeral Contrast Sensitivity Test for Use in Low-Vision Chinese Patients

Visual Performance of Color Contrast on VDT

Evaluation of the efficacy of contrast sensitivity measures for the detection of early primary open-angle glaucoma

Mobile app Aston contrast sensitivity test

Glare and contrast sensitivity testing in cataract patients

Normal values for a clinical test of letter-recognition contrast thresholds

A Study of Spatial Chromatic Contrast Sensitivity Based on Different Colors, Luminance, and Stimulus Patterns

The Past, Present and Future of Visual Acuity Charts

The design of a Chinese reading visual acuity chart with high and low contrast

[Contrast enhancement in the public environment--improvement in orienting capacity of visually handicapped patients]

Contrast sensitivity function based on color difference under different fields

Association of Contrast Sensitivity with Eye Disease and Vision-Related Quality of Life

Contrast Sensitivity Function: A More Sensitive Index for Assessing Protective Effects of the Cilioretinal Artery on Macular Function in High Myopia

A Study of Spatial Chromatic Contrast Sensitivity Based on Different Colour Background

Analysis of Contrast Sensitivity of High Myopia

Contrast sensitivity of emmetropes and myopes in bright and dark circumstances

Contrast Sensitivity and Binocular Logmar VA in 3 Different Daily Disposable Contact Lenses

Comparison of near vision in glaucoma patients using standard and reversed-contrast charts

Evaluation of contrast sensitivity in visually impaired individuals using K-CS test. A novel smartphone-based contrast sensitivity test–Design and validation

Contrast threshold recovery after bleaching during cone‐mediated mesopic adaptation: The effect of test conditions