Small bone-window of minimally invasive surgery on acute basal ganglia hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage

Wei-wen WANG,Wei ZHANG,Zhong-jun YAN
DOI: https://doi.org/10.16680/j.1671-3826.2017.12.05
2017-01-01
Abstract:Objective To investigate the curative effect and security of small bone-window minimally invasive surgery on acute basal ganglia hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage.Methods A retrospective study was performed on 164 cases of patients with acute basal ganglia hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage who were admitted from January 2015 to May 2016.According to different surgical methods,patients were divided into the conventional group (n =86) and the minimally invasive group (n =78).The recovery status,complications and prognosis of patients with acute hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage in the basal ganglia region were compared between the two groups.Results The operation time of the minimally invasive group was significantly shorter than that of the conventional group (P < 0.05),intraoperative blood loss was significantly less than that in the conventional group (P < 0.05),extubation time and length of stay were significantly shorter than those in the conventional group (P < 0.05),the effects on hematoma clearance were the same,there was no statistically significant difference in re-bleeding or in-hospital mortality(P > 0.05).Two weeks after operation,the coma degree and neurological function of the two groups were significantly improved,while there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups (P > 0.05);the levels of inflammation in both groups were significantly lower than those before the surgery,and the level of inflammation in the minimally invasive group was significantly lower than that in the conventional group (P < 0.05).The complications such as the proportion of pulmonary infection and the total incidence of complications in the minimally invasive group were significantly lower than those in the conventional group(P < 0.05).Six months after the surgery,the proportion of activities of daily living prognosis rating Ⅰ-Ⅲ grade in the minimally invasive group was slightly higher than that in the conventional group,while the difference was not statistically significant (P > 0.05).Conclusion Small bone-window of minimally invasive surgery has the same effect as the conventional surgery,and with the advantages of small trauma,faster recovery and less complications.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?