Prognostic factors for autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease:a comparative study between peritoneal dialysis and he-modialysis

Wei-ye ZHU,Jie-bin HOU,Xiao-xi WANG,Tie-yun WANG,Jun DU,Li-fang ZHAO,Hai-yan WANG,Xue-li LAI,Zhi-yong GUO
DOI: https://doi.org/10.16680/j.1671-3826.2016.12.01
2016-01-01
Abstract:Objective To investigate the comparative effects between hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis on the prognosis of end-stage renal disease( ESRD) of patients with autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease( ADPKD) . Methods A retrospective study was performed on 43 patients diagnosed of ADPKD who were received in Changhai Hospital of Second Military Medical University from March 1999 to August 2014. According to the initial dialysis methods,43 patients were divided into the peritoneal dialysis(PD) group (n=20) and the hemodialysis(HD) group(n=23). During the follow-up period,the cardiovascular events were recorded and the in-cidence of the cardiovascular events in patients between the two groups were compared. The survivorship curve was drawn on the basis of all-cause mortality as the end point event,and the survival rate between the two groups were compared by Kaplan Meier method and Log-Rank inspection. Results There were 43 patients involved in this study,and the longest follow-up period was 147 months. The in-cidence of the cardiovascular events in the PD group and the HD group was 5. 0%(1/20) and 26. 1%(6/23),respectively;the differ-ence was statistically significant( P<0. 01 ) . During the follow-up period, and the survival rate in the PD group and HD group was 85. 0%( 17/20 ) and 73. 9%( 17/23 ) , respectively;the difference was not statistically significant ( P>0. 05 ) . Conclusion Either peritoneal dialysis or hemodialysis is the effective method of renal replacement therapy. Compared with peritoneal dialysis,patients who receive hemodialysis have low cardiovascular events probability.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?