Abstract:Objective The widely use of ultrasound elastography has increased the detection rate of breast cancer.It has great advantage of differential diagnosis of breast tumor.Our study is to evaluate and compare the value of the quantitative ultrasound elastography parameters of AR ( area ratio) , ESR ( entire strain ratio) , LSR ( locolized strain ratio) , EFLR( entire fat to lesion ratio) and LFLR( locolized fat to lesion ratio) in the differential diagnosis of breast tumor. Methods 110 patients with 113 breast tumors were collected from Nanjing General Hospital of Nanjing Military Region between January 2015 and January 2016 who underwent breast exami-nation.The tumors were divided into two groups according to patholo-gy which acts as gold standard:benign group with 59 lesions and ma-lignant group with 54 lesions.Participants underwent quantitative ul-trasound elastography parameters examination.AR、ESR、LSR、EFLR、LFLR were compared between benign group and malignant group and ROC curve was drawn.Conventional ultrasound and ultrasound elastography parameter are combined to differentiate the benign or malignant lesion.Calculate the various parameters on the accuracy、susceptibility、specificity、positive likelihood ratio、negative likeli-hood ratio of the diagnosis of benign and malignant lesions, and determine the quantitative parameter with the highest accuracy. Results The mean value of AR、ESR、LSR、EFLR and LFLR of malignant lesions were all significantly greater than that of benign le-sions (P=0.000).Compared with the conventional ultrasound, AR、ESR、LSR、EFLR and LFLR have higher AUC in the differentia-tion of benign and malignant breast lesions;AUC of AR and ESR are higher than conventional ultrasound、LSR、EFLR and LFLR( P<0.000).Compared with conventional ultrasound(1.523) alone, conventional ultrasound combined separately with AR、ESR、EFLR and LFLR have higher positive likelihood ratio(11.581、8.272、3.482、2.458、2.100) in the differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions, so as accuracy、susceptibility、specificity(P<0.000).The AUC of conventional ultrasound combined separately with AR and ESR[0.940(0.890~0.990)、0.941(0.891~0.990)] were higher than conventional ultrasound and conventional ultrasound com-bined separately with LSR、EFLR、LFLR[0.669(0.669~0.768)、0.837(0.759~0.915)、0.763(0.673~0.852)、0.787(0.701~0.874)],so as accuracy、susceptibility、specificity and positive likelihood ratio(P<0.000). Conclusion Quantitative ultrasound elastography may be helpful in differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions, especially combining conventional ultrasound with AR and ESR, which were superior to combining with the other parameters and provide a more objective and credible basis to differenti-ate benign and malignant breast tumors with conventional ultrasound.

Comparison between Eklund and conventional mammography techniques in patients with augmented breasts

Differential Diagnosis of Imaging Fmdings Between Patients with Triple-Negative Breast Cancer and Patients with Idiopathic Granulomatous Mastitis

Diagnostic Evaluations of Ultrasound and Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Mammary Duct Ectasia and Breast Cancer

Can Combined Screening of Ultrasound and Elastography Improve Breast Cancer Identification Compared with MRI in Women with Dense Breasts-a Multicenter Prospective Study

Comparison of the background echotexture between automated breast ultrasound and handheld breast ultrasound

A Comparative Assessment of Three Planes of Implant Placement in Breast Augmentation: A Bayesian Analysis

The differentiation of malignant and benign lesions of the breast by quantitative Ultrasound elastography

Re-evaluation of high-risk breast mammography lesions by target ultrasound and ABUS of breast non-mass-like lesions

Comparison of the value of shear wave elastography and digital mammography in differential diagnosis of breast neoplasms

Combined Use of the Automated Breast Volume Scanner and the US Elastography for the Differentiation of Benign from Malignant Lesions of the Breast

Elastosonography and Two-Dimensional Ultrasonography in Diagnosis of Axillary Lymph Node Metastasis in Breast Cancer

Added Value of a New Strain Elastography Technique in Conventional Ultrasound for the Diagnosis of Breast Masses: A Prospective Multicenter Study

Evaluation of endometrial thickness in breast cancer patients with tamoxifen treatment - Difference between 2-dimensional ultrasonography and elastosonography

Value of Combined Application of Ultrasonic Elastography and Conventional Ultrasonography in the Differen tial Diagnosis of Breast Lesions

Breast Elasticity Imaging Techniques: Comparison of Strain Elastography and Shear-Wave Elastography in the Same Population

Diagnostic Efficacy of Contrast-Enhanced Sonography by Combined Qualitative and Quantitative Analysis in Breast Lesions A Comparative Study with Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Diagnostic Performance of Contrast-Enhanced Spectral Mammography

Comparative Study on the Density of Breast Cancer by Ultrasound, Mammography and MRI

A Comparative Study of Three Ultrasonic Elastographic Methods for the Differentiation and Diagnosis of Benign and Malignant Breast Masses

Characterization of Breast Lesions: Comparison Between Three-dimensional Ultrasound and Automated Volume Breast Ultrasound

Comparison between qualitative and quantitative assessment of background parenchymal enhancement on breast MRI