Retinectomy versus vitrectomy combined to scleral buckling repair of posterior segment open globe injuries with retina incarceration

Yong Wei,Guoji Wu,Jianzhou Wang,Zhongqiao Zu,Rui Wang,Runsheng Wang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.1006-4443.2016.01.011
2016-01-01
Abstract:Objective To evaluate the anatomic and functional outcomes of pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) combined with scleral buckling (SB) versus retinectomy in treating eyes with posterior segment open globe injuries and retina incarceration.Methods Twenty-two eyes with posterior segment open globe injuries and retina incarceration were identified,and 11 of them (group A) underwent the combined treatment of PPV with SB,matched another 11 eyes treated with retinectomy (group B).Both groups were equivalent in the three matching factors:the severity of injury (including wound length),location of the incarceration site,presence of retinal detachment.Anatomic reattachment of the retina and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) were measured at the time of 12 months after operation.Results Patients in group A demonstrated a significant improvement in anatomic retinal attachment compared with patients in group B (81.82% vs 63.64%) at the time of 12 months after operation (P =0.632).BCVA were improved in 6 eyes (54.54%) of group A and 4 eyes (36.36%) in group B at the time of 12 months after operation (P =0.361).However,eyes in group B had higher rates of postoperation hemorrhage (45.45% vs 0) and postoperation inflammation (36.36% vs 9.09%).Conclusions For eyes with posterior segment open globe injuries and retina incarceration,patients with PPV and SB demonstrate a significant improvement in anatomical and function outcomes,and less postoperation complications compared with patients with retinectomy.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?