The outcomes of frozen embryo transfer in patients with thin endometrium with local stimulation

Ying-chun ZHU,Jing-yu LIU,Tian-ran SONG,Bin WANG,Fang-fang HE,Hai-xiang SUN
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1672-271X.2017.05.007
2017-01-01
Abstract:Objective The paper evaluates the impacts of endometrial stimulation to thin endometrium in patients on frozen embryo transfer outcomes. Methods Retrospective analysis of 157 cycles included in this study in which patients with thin endome-trium were transferred with high quality division frozen embryos. The cycles were divided into endometrial stimulation group (experi-mental group) and the non-stimulation group (control group).Patients of Endometrial stimulation group (60 embryo transfer cycles) re-ceived Endometrial stimulation 1 week before transplantation. Patients of non-stimulation group (97 embryo transfer cycles) were trea-ted without Endometrial stimulation. The clinical pregnancy rate, implantation rate, ectopic pregnancy rate and early abortion rate were compared between the two groups. Results Clinical pregnancy rate (61. 67% vs 52. 58%) and implantation rate (44. 34% vs 41.88%) increased in endometrial stimulation group than that in non-stimulation group, and ectopic pregnancy rate (2.70% vs 3.92%) and early abortion rate (8.11% vs 17.65%) decreased in endometrial stimulation group than that in non-stimulation group. However, the differences between the two groups were not statistically significant. Conclusion Endometrial stimulation for patients with thin endometrium had a tendency to improve pregnancy rate and implantation rate of frozen embryo transfer. Ectopic pregnancy rate and early abortion rate had a tendency to reduce. But based on the sample size and other factors, the difference between the two groups was not statistically significant. We need to expand the sample size, and refine the details for further discussion.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?