Abstract:When a v i r h and a living cell are brought close together, there is no discernible reaction between them in the great majority of instances. However, if the virus and the host cell possess those complementary properties which permit designation of the virus as infectious and the host cell as susceptible, then a series of reactions may occur which leads to an increase in the amount of virus. The reactions which follow infection of a susceptible host cell with a virus have many aspects (Woodruff and Goodpasture, 1930). One of these is the stepwise process which results in the development of new viral particles (Burnet, 1929; Ellis and Delbriick, 1939; Delbriick, 1940a and 1910b; Henle, et al. 1947; Ginsberg and Horsfall, 1949a and 1951a). This process is termed viral multiplication or proliferation and is affected in various ways by a large number of factors (Horsfall, 1949). Some of the more prominent factors are: (1) the genetic features of the host cell and the virus; (2) the metabolic state of the host cell; (3) the presence of another virus; and (4) the composition of the extracellular environment. The most evident ways in which such factors act are the augmentation or inhibition of viral proliferation so that either more or less virus develops (Horsfall, 195 1). Before proceeding to a more detailed consideration of factors which, a t the cellular level, have an effect upon the multiplication of viruses, another aspect of animal virus infections deserces emphasis. Viruses which induce infections in animal species do not usually come into contact with host cells susceptible to infection immediately after gaining en& to the body. In most instances, the infectious agent is transported from the portal of entry to the tissue that contains suceptible cells. In no case is it known that all types of cells are equally susceptible to infection. In many instances, susceptibility is restricted to cells of a single type; in some, to cells present only in a single tissue. During the period of transport to susceptible cells, the naked viral particle is in a highly vulnerable condition and can be prevented readily from reaching cells it can infect. The most specific and probably the most effective substances which can act at this stage are antibodies directed against the agent. Specific antiviral antibodies develop as a result of contact with the agent. Usually, though not always, they are a reflection of immunity and are found not only in the blood, but also in the tissue fluids, as well as in the secretions of the mucous membranes (Francis, et al. 1943). Much evidence indicates that the interaction between antibody and viral particle prevents adsorption of the virus by susceptible cells and thus the process of multiplication does not begin (Delbriick, 1945a; Volkert and Horsfall, 1947). In contrast to the striking effectiveness of antibodies in preventing infection of the cell is their marked lack of effect upon viral proliferation once the virus has pene-

Protective effect of metformin on PC12 cell injury induced by hypoxia

Metabolomic Analysis of the Ameliorative Effect of Enhanced Proline Metabolism on Hypoxia-Induced Injury in Cardiomyocytes.

Splenic irradiation portals.

Acute Administration of Metformin Protects Against Neuronal Apoptosis Induced by Cerebral Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury via Regulation of the AMPK/CREB/BDNF Pathway

[Chronic intestinal pseudo-obstruction as a paraneoplastic presentation of limited-stage small cell lung cancer].

FACTORS CONCERNED WITH VIRAL PROLIFERATION IN VIVO

Metformin attenuates myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury via up-regulation of antioxidant enzymes

[Current Indications for Surgery in Small Cell Lung Cancer].

Metformin protects against pericyte apoptosis and promotes neurogenesis through suppressing JNK p38 MAPK signalling activation in ischemia/reperfusion injury

[On a rare case of bicornuate uterus with double cervix, double vagina, hematocolpos, hematometra, right unilateral hematosalpinx, partial atresia of the vagina and right renal aplasia].

Metformin alleviates cerebral ischemia/reperfusion injury aggravated by hyperglycemia via regulating AMPK/ULK1/PINK1/Parkin pathway-mediated mitophagy and apoptosis

Decree No. 18717-PLAN-S, 14 December 1988.

Metformin protects the myocardium against isoproterenol-induced injury in rats through alleviating endoplasmic reticulum stress.

High-glucose-induced apoptosis, ROS production and pro-inflammatory response in cardiomyocytes is attenuated by metformin treatment via PP2A activation

Neuroprotective effects of metformin on cerebral ischemia‐reperfusion injury by regulating PI3K/Akt pathway

Metformin protects high glucose‐cultured cardiomyocytes from oxidative stress by promoting NDUFA13 expression and mitochondrial biogenesis via the AMPK signaling pathway

Neuroprotective Effects of Metformin on Cerebral Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury: Modulation of JNK and p38 MAP Kinase Signaling Pathways

Metformin attenuates high glucose-induced injury in islet microvascular endothelial cells

Metformin protects against hyperglycemia-induced cardiomyocytes injury by inhibiting the expressions of receptor for advanced glycation end products and high mobility group box 1 protein

Metformin prevents methylglyoxal-induced apoptosis by suppressing oxidative stress in vitro and in vivo

Involvement of Catalase in the Protective Benefits of Metformin in Mice with Oxidative Liver Injury.