Short-axis PET image quality improvement based on a uEXPLORER total-body PET system through deep learning
Zhenxing Huang,Wenbo Li,Yaping Wu,Nannan Guo,Lin Yang,Na Zhang,Zhifeng Pang,Yongfeng Yang,Yun Zhou,Yue Shang,Hairong Zheng,Dong Liang,Meiyun Wang,Zhanli Hu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-023-06422-x
Abstract:Purpose: The axial field of view (AFOV) of a positron emission tomography (PET) scanner greatly affects the quality of PET images. Although a total-body PET scanner (uEXPLORER) with a large AFOV is more sensitive, it is more expensive and difficult to widely use. Therefore, we attempt to utilize high-quality images generated by uEXPLORER to optimize the quality of images from short-axis PET scanners through deep learning technology while controlling costs. Methods: The experiments were conducted using PET images of three anatomical locations (brain, lung, and abdomen) from 335 patients. To simulate PET images from different axes, two protocols were used to obtain PET image pairs (each patient was scanned once). For low-quality PET (LQ-PET) images with a 320-mm AFOV, we applied a 300-mm FOV for brain reconstruction and a 500-mm FOV for lung and abdomen reconstruction. For high-quality PET (HQ-PET) images, we applied a 1940-mm AFOV during the reconstruction process. A 3D Unet was utilized to learn the mapping relationship between LQ-PET and HQ-PET images. In addition, the peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR) and structural similarity index measure (SSIM) were employed to evaluate the model performance. Furthermore, two nuclear medicine doctors evaluated the image quality based on clinical readings. Results: The generated PET images of the brain, lung, and abdomen were quantitatively and qualitatively compatible with the HQ-PET images. In particular, our method achieved PSNR values of 35.41 ± 5.45 dB (p < 0.05), 33.77 ± 6.18 dB (p < 0.05), and 38.58 ± 7.28 dB (p < 0.05) for the three beds. The overall mean SSIM was greater than 0.94 for all patients who underwent testing. Moreover, the total subjective quality levels of the generated PET images for three beds were 3.74 ± 0.74, 3.69 ± 0.81, and 3.42 ± 0.99 (the highest possible score was 5, and the minimum score was 1) from two experienced nuclear medicine experts. Additionally, we evaluated the distribution of quantitative standard uptake values (SUV) in the region of interest (ROI). Both the SUV distribution and the peaks of the profile show that our results are consistent with the HQ-PET images, proving the superiority of our approach. Conclusion: The findings demonstrate the potential of the proposed technique for improving the image quality of a PET scanner with a 320 mm or even shorter AFOV. Furthermore, this study explored the potential of utilizing uEXPLORER to achieve improved short-axis PET image quality at a limited economic cost, and computer-aided diagnosis systems that are related can help patients and radiologists.