Abstract:OBJECTIVE:To explore the value of diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) and perfusion weighted imaging (PWI) in identifying benign and malignant renal masses and differentiating the histological types of renal masses. METHODS:Fifteen healthy volunteers and 46 patients with renal masses proven by pathology, including clear cell carcinomas (n = 18), papillary carcinomas (n = 8), chromophobe carcinomas (n = 7) and angiomyolipomas (n = 13), were examined with DWI and PWI scan at 3.0 T MRI. ANOVA was employed to compare the values of transfer constant (K(trans)), rate constant of backflux (Kep) and extra-vascular extra-cellular space fractional volume (Ve) proceeded by PWI and the value of ADC resulted from DWI between normal kidney and different histological types of renal masses. Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve was used to analyze and compare the diagnostic value of the methods of PWI and DWI in differentiating benign and malignant renal masses. RESULTS:The ADC value of normal renal parenchyma was (2.10 ± 0.24) × 10⁻³ mm²/s, which was statistically higher than benign and malignant renal masses (P < 0.05). The ADC value of benign masses was statistically higher than that of all histological types of malignant masses (P < 0.05). Among three histological types of malignancies, clear cell carcinoma showed the statistically highest ADC value (P < 0.05). But the difference between papillary carcinoma and chromophobe carcinoma had no statistical significance (P > 0.05).Values of K(trans), Kep and Ve between normal renal parenchyma and different histological types of renal masses had statistical differences.Values of K(trans) and Ve in three histological types of malignant renal masses were statistically higher than those of benign renal masses.Kep value of clear cell carcinoma was significantly higher than that of benign renal masses (P < 0.05).However, other histological types of malignant masses had no significant difference with benign masses.For three malignant masses, K(trans) of clear cell carcinoma, papillary carcinoma and chromophobe carcinoma were (0.85 ± 0.27), (0.51 ± 0.04) and (0.39 ± 0.05)/min respectively. All values gradually reduced. And the differences were statistically significant (P < 0.05). The Ve value of renal clear cell carcinoma was statistically higher than that of papillary carcinoma (P < 0.05). ROC curve was used to analyze and compare the diagnostic value of PWI versus DWI in differentiating benign and malignant renal masses. The K(trans) of benign and malignant renal masses had the largest AUC (AUC = 0.937) at a threshold of 0.38/min. And there were a sensitivity of 87.9% and a specificity of 85.7%. The AUC of ADC was 0.823, sensitivity 72.7% and specificity 92.9%. The ADC threshold for differentiating benign from malignant masses was 1.40 × 10⁻³ mm²/s; AUC of Ve 0.803, sensitivity 78.8% and specificity 71.4%, a threshold of 0.29/min; Kep showed lower diagnostic value. CONCLUSION:3.0 T MRI DWI and PWI can effectively differentiate benign and different histological types of malignant renal masses. And PWI is superior to DWI in differentiating benign and malignant renal masses.K(trans) with the largest AUC showed the highest diagnostic value. And ADC is also irreplaceable in providing the information of cellular structural features and the movement of water diffusion.

Comparison of 1.5T and 3.0T diffusion-weighted imaging in the application of the complex adnexal masses in female patients

Evaluation of primary adnexal masses with 3.0T MRI:value of conventional MR imaging and diffusion-weighted imaging in categorization

Diffusion Weighted Imaging and Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Value in Differential Diagnosis of Lymph Node Lesions

The Application of Diffusion-Weighted MR Imaging in Cervical Lymph Node Lesions

Application of 3.0T-MRI DWI in evaluating the efficacy of synchronous radiotherapy and chemotherapy for advanced lung cancer

Application of 3.0T magnetic resonance diffusion weighted imaging in the advanced gastric cancer

The application of diffusion-weighted MR imaging for predicting benignity or malignancy of complex adnexal masses

Evaluation of Primary Adnexal Masses by 3T MRI: Categorization with Conventional MR Imaging and Diffusion-Weighted Imaging.

Diagnostic Accuracy of Diffusion-Weighted Imaging with Conventional MR Imaging for Differentiating Complex Solid and Cystic Ovarian Tumors at 1.5T

[Diffusion Weighted Imaging and Perfusion Weighted Imaging in the Differential Diagnosis of Benign and Malignant Renal Masses on 3.0 T MRI].

Value of Diffusion-weighted Imaging with Different b Values in the Diagnosis of Breast Lesions at 3.0T MRI

Clinical Application and Research of Diffusion Weighted MR Imaging in Complex Ovarian Tumors

Diagnostic Value of Diffusion Weighted Imaging for Breast Lesions at 3.0T MR

Differential Diagnostic Value of Diffusion Weighted Imaging at 3.0 T of Benign and Malignancy Breast Lesions

Diagnostic Assessment by Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced and Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance in Differentiation of Breast Lesions under Different Imaging Protocols

MR diffusion-weighted imaging in differential diagnosis of breast lesions with different enhancement shapes or size and parameter selection

Value of Diffusion-Weighted Imaging and Apparent Diffusion Coefficient in Diagnosis of Malignant Lymphoma at 3.0T MRI

Diagnostic value of DWI for the adnexal cystic masses in female patients

Characterization of Breast Masses As Benign or Malignant at 3.0t Mri with Whole-Lesion Histogram Analysis of the Apparent Diffusion Coefficient

Clinical application of diffusion-weighted MRI in uterine tumors-evaluation of signal intensity and ADC values

Application Values of 3.0T Magnetic Resonance Diffusion Weighted Imaging for Distinguishing Liver Malignant Tumors and Benign Lesions