Ultra-High-Resolution Computed Tomography Findings for Patients with Focal Pulmonary Ground-Glass Nodule of 3 cm or Less

邹勤,刘士远,管宇,范丽,李琼,夏艺,顾亚峰
DOI: https://doi.org/10.13437/j.cnki.jcr.2017.04.010
2017-01-01
Abstract:Objective To evaluate the diagnostic value of the Ultra-high-resolution CT (Ultra-HRCT) in focal pulmonary ground-glass nodule (fGGN) of 3cm or less.Methods Thirty-two consecutive pathologically confirmed fGGNs were included in this prospective study.All the fGGNs with the maximum diameter ≤ 3 cm were scanned by Ultra-HRCT and conventional high-resolution CT(C-HRCT) respectively.The morphologic findings and diagnostic strength of Ultra-HRCT and C-HRCT were analyzed respectively.The mean image noise,SNR and CNR with each protocol were assessed.According to the definition and the artifact of the vascular structure,4-point method was used to grade image quality.Results There were no differences between the two groups for spicules,vacuole sign,nodule sign,bronchus expansion and distortion and pleural indentation.The lung-tumor interface and lobulation could be seen with Ultra-HRCT better than C-HRCT(P < 0.05).Significant differences were found in diagnostic strength between the two groups(P =0.002).The Ultra-HRCT significantly improved the mean image noise and decreased the SNR and CNR compared with C-HRCT(P < 0.001).On the other hand,the score of HRCT is higher in the image quality because the Ultra-HRCT is more susceptible to motion artifact and bone artifact,but there were no obvious differences.Conclusion The diagnostic power of Ultra-HRCT is significant better than C-HRCT.The morphologic findings of Ultra-HRCT is superior to C-HRCT in lung-tumor interface and lobulation.Although the Ultra-HRCT is more susceptible to motion and bone artifact,the diagnosis was not subjectively affected.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?