CD133 Positive U87 Glioma Stem Cell Radiosensitivity and DNA Double-Strand Break Repair

LI Ping,ZONG Tian-zhou,JI Xiao-qin,LU Xue-guan
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-4114.2013.03.007
2013-01-01
Abstract:Objective To explore the radiosensitivity and DNA double-strand break repair of CD133+ U87 glioma stem cell.Methods CD133+ and CD133-cells were isolated from glioma U87 cell lines by flow cytometry sorter system.After irradiated vertically by 4 Gy X-rays,the radiosensitivity of cells was determined by clonogenic assay.The radiation-induced DNA double-strand break repair of CD133 + and CD133-ceils was determined by the neutral comet assay,and the expression of phosphorylated histone H2AX (γ-H2AX) and Rad51 foci were measured by immunofluorescence.Results The clone forming rate of CD133+ cells was higher than CD133-cells (t=3.66,P<0.01) with no radiation.The clone forming rate of CD133+ cells irradiated by 4 Gy X-rays has no significant changes compared to that of the non-irradiation cells (t=0.71,P>0.05),but for CD 133 cells,it decreased compared to non-irradiation cells (t=2.91,P<0.05).The tailmoment between CD 133+ cells and CD 133-cells had no difference at 0.5 h after irradiation (t=1.44,P>0.05); the tailmoment of CD133+ cells was lower than CD133 cells at 6 and 24 h after irradiation,respectively (t=5.31 and 8.09,P<0.01).There was no significant difference in the expression of γ-H2AX foci between CD133+ and CD133-cells at 0.5 and 6 h after irradiation(t=0.12 and 0.99,P>0.05),γ-H2AX foci of CD133+ cells was significantly decreased compared to CD133-cells at 24 h after irradiation (t=4.99,P<0.01).For Rad 51 foci,there was no difference between CD133+ and CD133-cells at 0.5 h after irradiation(t=1.12,P>0.05).The expression of Rad 51 foci of CD133-cells was decreased compared to that of CD133+ cells at 6 and 24 h after irradiation,respectively (t=22.88 and 12.43,P<0.01).And the expression of Rad51 foci of CD133+ cells had no significant changes at 6-24 h after irradiation.Conclusions Glioma stem cells is more radioresistive than glioma non-stem cells.The probable mechanism is that the DNA double-strand break repair capacity of glioma stem cells is more powerful than non-stem cells.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?