Pharmacokinetics of injection recombinant human lymphotoxin-α derivative in Chinese advanced cancer patients

Wei WANG,Li-hou DONG,Hai-feng SONG,Yi FANG,Hua WANG
DOI: https://doi.org/10.13699/j.cnki.1001-6821.2018.04.008
2018-01-01
Abstract:Objective To study the pharmacokinetics of recombinant human lymphotoxin-or derivative (rhLTct) after multiple doses injection in Chinese advanced cancer patients.Methods Twelve advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) patients and twelve advanced gastric carcinoma (GC) patients were allocated into two arms,each consisted of 12 cases,and were received multiple dose of rhLTα (10 μg · m-2 or 20 μg · m-2 once daily for 5 consecutive days) by intravenous infusion.The LTα concentrations in plasma at day 1 and day 5 were determined by enzyme-linked immunoassay method (ELASE).Results The main pharmacokinetic parameters of day 1 and day 5 were as follow:10 μg · m-2:AUC0-1 were (9473.40 ±6976.95) and (9390.14 ± 6494.89) pg · mL-1 · min,AUC0-inf were (10324.26 ± 7611.415) and (10163.09 ± 6795.82)pg · mL-1 · min,Cmax were (156.92 ± 106.57) and (174.44 ± 100.62) pg · mL-1,tmax were(53.42 ± 14.87) and (54.17 ± 17.43) min,t1/2 were (17.78 ±5.91) and (20.43 ±5.35) min,CL were(128.44 ± 128.63) and (120.68±106.06) L· h-1· m-2,Vd were (126.63±115.60) and (129.98 ±127.04) L · m-2;20 μg· m-2:AUC0-t were(26458.97 ± 16064.90)and(25314.11 ±9587.38)pg · mL-1 · min,AUC0-inf were (27531.84 ± 16562.03)and (27297.33 ± 10295.65) pg · mL-1 · min,Cmaax were (467.73 ±288.74) and (473.14 ±200.79) pg · mL-1,tmax were (60.91 ± 8.31) and (60.50 ± 3.69) min,t1/2 were (30.12 ± 6.79) and (28.20 ± 6.53) min,CL were (69.69±56.21) and (55.94 ±27.51) L · h-1 · m-2,Vd were (88.25 ±86.02) and (73.23 ±36.97)L · m-2 Conclusion LTα exposure level has an increasing trend after multiple intravenous infusion of rhLTα,but the average Cmin after the treatment does not increase with the increase of dosing frequency.The results show that the pharmacokinetic behavior of rhLTα has certain individual differences with individual patients and heterogeneity of tumor.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?