Interim Analysis of Afatinib Monotherapy in Patients with Metastatic Nsclc Progressing after Chemotherapy and Erlotinib/Gefitinib (E/G) in A Trial of Afatinib Plus Paclitaxel Versus Investigator'S Choice Chemotherapy Following Progression on Afatinib Monotherapy
Martin H. Schuler,David Planchard,James Chih-Hsin Yang,Joo-Hang Kim,Filippo De Marinis,Yuh-Min Chen,Caicun Zhou,Jaafar Bennouna,Xiaoqing Liu,Feng,Paolo Bidoli,Janos Strausz,Sai-Hong Ignatius Ou,Vikram K. Chand,Bushi Wang,Gerd Michael Munzert,Keunchil Park
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2012.30.15_suppl.7557
IF: 45.3
2012-01-01
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Abstract:7557 Background: The benefit of sustained ErbB family blockade in NSCLC patients with acquired resistance (AR) to EGFR TKIs is unknown. We investigated afatinib, an irreversible blocker of EGFR (ErbB1), HER2 (ErbB2) and ErbB4 receptor tyrosine kinases, in patients with metastatic NSCLC, who had failed chemotherapy and E/G. Methods: This was a Phase III, randomized, open-label, multi-center trial. Patients with pathologically confirmed Stage IIIB/IV metastatic NSCLC after ≥1 line of chemotherapy who failed E/G received oral afatinib 50 mg until disease progression (Part A). After progression, patients with clinical benefit (≥12 wks) were eligible to continue afatinib 40 mg plus paclitaxel or receive investigator’s choice chemotherapy (Part B). Primary endpoint for Part A was PFS (RECIST 1.1; CT scan every 6 wks). Available tumor samples were collected for central EGFR mutation testing; local mutation data were also collected. An interim analysis of Part A, assessing afatinib monotherapy, is reported. Results: Part A enrolled April 2010 through to May 2011; 1154 patients received afatinib monotherapy. The majority had adenocarcinoma (85%), 57% were female, 43% were Asian, 54% were never smokers. Best response to prior E/G was CR (2%), PR (31%), SD (42%) and PD (20%). Median PFS for afatinib was 3.3 mths; 88 patients (8%) achieved an objective tumor response, 648 (56%) had SD. For EGFR mutation positive patients (n=49, centrally confirmed), PFS was 4.2 vs. 2.6 mths for EGFR mutation negative patients (n=35). When applying clinical enrichment criteria for AR, PFS was 4.2 mths for those with enrichment (n=597) vs. 2.8 mths for those without (n= 557; logrank test p<0.0001). The most common grade 3/4 adverse events were diarrhea (17%) and rash/acne (11%). In Part A, 99 patients remain on treatment. Conclusions: Afatinib monotherapy provided a clinically meaningful benefit in this large, treatment-refractory NSCLC trial, similar to LUX-Lung 1. Those clinically enriched for AR to EGFR TKIs achieved prolonged disease control upon continued ErbB blockade.