The efficacy and safety of mesalazine in the treatment o f inflammatory bowel disease--A nationwide multicenter clinical trial

Guo-liang WU,Ye-qiu TANG,Xiang-xi SU,Fu-Lian HU,Geng-jin LIN,Ai-li YUAN,Peng-yan XIE,Jian-xiang LIU,Yao-zong YUAN,Yun-biao HU,Guo-ming XU,Xiao-j ZHANG,Zhao-xu YANG,Ying-heng ZHAO,Jian-quan YANG,Lan ZHOU
2001-01-01
Abstract:Objective:To observe the efficacy and safety of Etiasa,a control released tablet of mesalazine,in treatment of inflammatory bowel diseas e(IBD) in comparison with salicylazosulfapyridine (SASP).Methods:The r andomized,multicenter,and controlled study was conducted in 89 patients with end oscopy confirmed mild or moderate ulcerative colitis (UC) or Crohn's disease (CD ) of initial onset.They were randomly allocated to Etiasa (n=52) or SASP(n =37)both in a dose of 1.0g qid for 6 weeks.After that they were examined b y endoscopy.The efficacy and side effects were evaluated at week 4 and week 6. Results:There were 3 patients in SASP withdrawn from the study because of al lergic reaction or leukopenia at the end of the 4th week.52 patients in Etiasa g roup and 34 patients in SASP group completed the study.The obvious improvement r ate in Etiasa group at the end of the 4th and the 6th week is 52.0% and 71.2% re spectively,by evaluation of patients vs 20.6% and 50.0% in SASP group (P<0.0 5).Disappearance rate of GI symptoms at the end of the 6th week is 57.7% in Etia sa group vs 50.0% in SASP group(P<0.05).Cure rate confirmed by endoscopy at the end of the 6th week is 26.9% in Etiasa group vs 2.9% in SASP group (P <0.05).The incidence of side effects is 1.9%(1/52) in Etiasa group vs 10.8%.(4 /37) in SASP group(P>0.05)。Conclusion:Etiasa is an effective agen t for treatment of IBD.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?