Effects of Ciproxifan in Modulation of Pain Transmission in Mice

汪慧菁,鲁映青,于榕,贡沁燕,史念慈,姚明辉
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1007-7669.2004.12.001
2004-01-01
Abstract:AIM:To investigate the effects of ciproxifan (CPF) in modulation of pain transmission in mice and its mechanism. METHODES:The antinociceptive effect of CPF was observed at the absence and presence of α-fluoromethylhistidine (α-FMH), a specific inhibitor of histidine decarboxylase (HDC), in three hyperalgesic models of mice (hot plate test, writhing test and formalin test). Furthermore, the levels of nitric oxide (NO) and prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) in brain, spinal and serum were assessed after formalin stimulation. RESULTS: Intraperitoneal (ip) administration of CPF 1, 3 mg·kg-1 could produce antinociception in hot plate test. And CPF 1 mg·kg-1 (ip) could decrease the numbers of writhing with the highest inhibitory rate of 49.85 % in writhing test. In formalin test, the subcutaneous formalin evoked biphasic (phaseⅠand phaseⅡ) licking behavior of the injected paw. The licking times of both phases were significantly decreased in CPF 0.3, 1, 3 mg·kg-1 groups. All of the antinociceptive effects of CPF in three hyperalgesic models could be reversed by α-FMH (50 mg·kg-1, ip). Administration of CPF could decrease the elevated levels of NO and PGE2 induced by formalin in spinal and brain rather than in serum. CONCLUSION:CPF possesses antinociception in three hyperalgesic models of mice and is effective in both inflammatory and non-inflammatory pain induced by formalin. The antinociceptive effect of CPF might be related to the release of histamine, meanwhile, NO and PGE2 in spinal and brain might participate in the process of CPF antinociception.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?