Assessment of Immunosensitizing Potential of Shuanghuanglian for Injection Using Reporter Antigen Popliteal Lymph Node Assay

Zhao-hua LIU,Jing-chun YAO,Rong SUN,Yan-ru GUO,Fan-guang ZENG
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1672-8629.2017.01.002
2017-01-01
Abstract:Objective To explore mechanism of adverse drug reactions induced by Shuanghuanglian for injection (SHLI) and further evaluate the immunosensitizing potential of SHLI using reporter antigen popliteal lymph node assay (RA-PLNA) in BALB/c mice.Methods SPF female BALB/c mice (7~8 weeks old at the onset of the experiment),were randomly assigned into control (Veh),1 mg D-Penicillamine hydrochloride (D-pen),1 mg (L) and 5 mg (H) SHLI group.There are 4 groups and each group has 6 animals.Articles,respectively mixed with 10 μg Trinitropheny-Ovabumin (TNP-OVA),were injected subcutaneously into right hind foot pad of mice in 50 μL volume.On day 7 after injection,animals were sacrificed,the untreated and treated lateral popliteal lymph node (PLN) were isolated,weighed and prepared into single-cell suspensions respectively,and then PLN weight index (WI)and cells index (CI) were calculated.RA-PLNA responses were Observed.Trinitrophenyl-specific antibody forming cell (AFC)and the number of lymphocyte and macrophages in PLN were determined by Enzyme-linked immunospot assay (Elispot) and flow cytometry,respectively.When SHLI mixed with TNP-Ficoll using some another mice,the method is the same as TNP-OVA.Results 5 mg SHLI mixed with TNP-OVA or TNP-Ficoll induced positive reaction in RA-PLNA.However,only when 5 mg SHLI co-injected with TNP-OVA,TNP-specific AFC were observed in Elispot assay.Simultaneously,the number of macrophages in PLN increased in flow cytometry.Moreover,whether 5 mg SHLI with TNP-Ficoll or 1 mg SHLI mixed with TNP-OVA or TNP-Ficoll failed to induce TNP-specific reaction.Conclusion SHLI lacked the intrinsic capacity to sensitize or stimulate immune responses in BALB/c mice.This may imply that ADR induced by SHLI in clinic was mainly a non-IgE-mediated anaphylactoid reaction rather than IgE-mediated hypersensitivity reactions.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?