CHINET 2007 surveillance of bacterial resistance in China
WANG Fu,ZHU De-mei,HU Fu-pin,RUAN Fei-yi,NI Yu-xing,SUN Jing-yong,XU Ying-chun,SUN Hong-li,HU Yun-jian,AI Xiao-man,YU Yun-song,YANG Qing,SUN Zi-yong,JIAN Cui,JIA Bei,HUANG Wen-xiang,ZHUO Chao,SU Dan-hong,WEI Lian-hua,WU Ling,ZHANG Chao-xia,JI Ping,WANG Chuan-qing,XUE Jian-chang,ZHANG Hong,LI Wan-hua
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3321/j.issn:1009-7708.2008.05.002
2008-01-01
Abstract:Objective To investigate the resistance of clinical isolates from hospitals in several provinces in China. MethodsTen general hospitals and two children's hospitals were involved in this program. Bacterial susceptibility testing was carried out according to a unified protocol using Kirby-Bauer method. Results were analyzed according to CLSI 2007. ResultsA total of 36 001 clinical isolates were collected from January through December 2007,of which Gram negative organisms and Gram positive cocci accounted for 65.7% and34.3% respectively. Methicillin resistant strains in Staphylococcus spp (MRSA and MRCNS) accounted for an average of 58% and 77%. The resistance rates of MR strains to β-lactams and other antimicrobial agents were much higher than those of methicillin-sensitive strains. However,about 60%-80% of the MR strains were still susceptible to fosfomycin,TMP-SMZ and rifampin. No vancomycin,teicoplanin or linezolid resistant strains were found. In Enterococcus spp,the resistance rate of E. faecalis strains to most drugs tested was lower than that of E. faecium. However,the resistance rate of the later strains to chloramphenicol was only 6%. Resistance rates of E. faecalis strains to nitrofurantoin and fosfomycin were below 10%. Several strains resistant to vancomycin and teicoplanin were found in both E. faecalis and E. faecium,which was VanA type resistance as confirmed by PCR technique. ESBLs producing strains were detected in 55% and 45% of strains of E. coli and Klebsiella spp. (K. pneumoniae and K. oxytoca) respectively. Beta-lactamase producing strains in H. influenzae and M. catarrhalis were 27.4% and 96.1% respectively. Penicillin non-susceptible strains (PISP+PRSP) accounted for 88.5% and 26.4% in children's strains and adult strains respectively. Strains of Enterobacteriaceae were still highly susceptible to imipenem and meropenem. The overall resistance rate to both imipenem and meropenem was lower than 1%. Resistance rate of P. aeruginosa strains to imipenem and meropenem was in average of 36% and 28.5% respectively. Resistance rates of Acinetobacter spp to the above two drugs were 40% and 35% respectively. Minocycline had good activity against S. maltophilia and Burkholderia spp. The isolates resistant to minocycline were less than 5%. The resistance rates of non-fermentative Gram negative organisms to antimicrobial agents tested were much higher than those of Enterobacteriaceae,the resistance rates to cefoperazone-sulbactam being the lowest among all the drugs tested. Pan-resistant Gram negative strains were found in most hospitals,mostly P. aeruginosa and Acinetobacter spp.,and strains of K. pneumoniae and C. freundii to a lesser extent.ConclusionsBacterial resistance is still increasing,especially VRE,MDR and pan-resistant strains in Gram negative organisms. It is mandatory for hospitals to take effective control measures.