Use of ADE Trigger Tool for Monitoring Adverse Drug Events

Hai-xia ZHANG,Jia-xing FENG,Jin-chun LIU,Wei-hong GE
DOI: https://doi.org/10.13664/j.cnki.pcr.2016.05.016
2016-01-01
Abstract:Objective: T o explore and optimize the use of ADE trigger tool for monitoring adverse drug events (ADEs). Methods: Nineteen triggers were selected according to ADE trigger tool designed by the Institute for Healthcare Improvement (IHI) and situation of medicine using in Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital. Discharged patients' medical records in the third quarter of 2015 from Hospital Information System (HIS) of the hospital were reviewed and examined, including information of using medicine, conventional indices and progress notes. The records with positive triggers were further reviewed in order to identify ADEs and assess the correlation between each trigger and the occurrence of ADEs. Results: A total of 967 cases were reviewed, among which 417 positive triggers (319 patients involved) were detected. Thirty-three patients were identified with ADEs, and the total positive predictive value was 10.34% (33/319). The 33 ADEs contained 31 ADEs of level E, 2 ADEs of level F. The voluntary reporting rate of ADEs in the same period was 0.67%(147/21897), comparing with the detection rate of triggers, the difference was statistically significant. These 33 ADEs were not found in the voluntary reporting system. Conclusion: ADE trigger tool has a high sensitivity of finding adverse drug events. Comparing with the voluntary reporting rate, ADE trigger tool can find more ADEs. But the triggers should be modified according the situation of the hospital.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?