Therapeutic effects investigation of physical therapy and pharmacotherapy in the treatment of persistent allergic rhinitis

Jing-wei DU,Wen-xiang LIU,Jun FENG,Tao PENG,Hong-guang LI,Li-sha SU
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1005-3697.2016.06.011
2016-01-01
Abstract:Objective:To investigate the therapeutic effects of physical therapy and pharmacotherapy in the treatment of persis-tent allergic rhinitis.Methods:192 patients were randomly divided into 3 groups,A group 72 cases,B group 70 cases.A and B group were treated with focused ultrasound and radiofrequency ablation respectively under the endoscope and using spraying Mometasone Fu-roate Nasal Spray for 1 month after the operation.Patients of C group use the Mometasone Furoate Nasal Spray and Cetirizine Hydro-chloride Tablets for 1 month.Follow up for 6 months after treatment and evaluate the curative effect with scoring method.Results:Total effectiveness was as followed:1st months:A group 97.2%,B group 97.1% C group 96.0%;6 months:A group 90.3%,B group 87. 1%,C group 64.0%.The curative effect score of three group after the treatment for 1 month have no significant difference (P>0.05 ).Comparing the efficiency of patients in three groups after treatment for 6 months,there was significant difference of statisti-cally significance.The efficiency of A and B group were higher than group C (P<0.05 ).A group was better than B group with the score of sneezing after the treatment,the difference was significant (P<0.05).But B group was better than A group with the score of nasal congestion,the difference was significant (P <0.05 ).Conclusion:The curative effect of treatment with two physical therapy methods combined with mometasone furoate for persistent allergic rhinitis,the former is better than the latter for sneezing,but the im-provement of nasal congestion is less than the latter.Long-erm therapeutic effect of drug with AR is less than physical therapy in combi-nation with drug.The treatment with focused ultrasound combined with mometasone furoate for persistent AR is worth promoting,espe-cially suitable for medium and severe persistent AR patients.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?