Maintenance therapy with chidamide prevents from postoperative recurrence after autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for peripheral T cell lymphoma

Hongyun LIU,Song DONG,Yunjing ZENG,Li GAO,Xi ZHANG
DOI: https://doi.org/10.16016/j.1000-5404.202006020
2020-01-01
Abstract:Objective To investigate the efficacy and safety of chidamide maintenance therapy in prevention of the recurrence of peripheral T-cell lymphoma after autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (auto-PBSCT). Methods A retrospective study was carried out on 49 patients with peripheral T-cell lymphoma undergoing auto-PBSCT in our medical center from January 2017 to May 2018. According to whether receiving chidamide maintenance treatment after transplantation or not, they were divided into experimental group (n=23) and control group (n=26). The patients from the former group were given chidamide maintenance treatment, by taking orally 30 mg/time, twice/week, in an interval not less than 3 d, 30 min after breakfast, initiating from 30 to 45 d after transplantation. While those of the control group got no maintenance treatment, but were only examined and followed up regularly after transplantation. The main outcome measure was to observe the recurrence rate between these 2 groups in 2 years after transplantation. The secondary indicator was the differences in 1-year recurrence rate, 1- and 2-year progression free survival (PFS), and 2-year overall survival (OS) between them. The adverse effects of chidamide were observed during the maintenance treatment. Results Until the last follow-up of May 2020, the 2-year recurrence rate was only 39.1% in the experimental group, which was significantly lower than that of the control group (69.2%, P=0.047). In 1 year after transplantation, 5 patients (21.7%) in the experimental group and 14 patients (53.8%) in the control group had recurrence, with that in the control group significantly higher than that in the experimental group (P=0.039). The 1-year PFS was significantly better in the experimental group than the control group, but there was no significant difference in the 1-year OS between them. The experimental group also obtained better 2-year PSF and OS rates than the control group. No correlations were observed in the recurrence rate of citabenamine maintenance therapy with age, gender, pathological type, clinical stage, bone marrow invasion, and International Prognostic Index (IPI) score respectively (P>0.05). However, incomplete remission and elevated LDH level before transplantation were risk factors for poor prognosis (P < 0.05). The main adverse reactions of chidamide maintenance therapy were hematological adverse reactions in 10 cases, fatigue in 5 cases, digestive tract adverse reactions in 4 cases, and both mild damage to liver and kidney functions and thrombosis in 1 case.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?