FK506 Binding Protein 12.6 Knockout Exacerbates Detrusor Overactivity in Mice Possibly by Down-Regulating Ryanodine Receptor 2

ZHOU Hao,WANG Jun,JI Guangju,ZHENG Ji,ZHOU Zhansong
DOI: https://doi.org/10.16016/j.1000-5404.201907042
2019-01-01
Abstract:Objective To investigate the effect of FK506 binding protein 12.6 (FKBP12.6) knockout on detrusor overactivity (DO) in mice and explore the possible mechanism. Methods Mouse models of DO were established by partial bladder outlet obstruction (PBOO) in 30 wild-type mice (WT) and 30 homozygote FKBP12.6 knockout mice (KO group). All the mice were 8-10 weeks old and female. The morphology of the detrusor was observed using HE staining, and void spots and urodynamic test were used to assess the changes in the symptom of frequent urinary and the bladder pressure, respectively. Visceromotor responses (VMRs) and bladder smooth muscle electrical activity in the filling stage were recorded to assess the bladder response to pressure. Spontaneous contraction of the detrusor strips was tested to evaluate the sensitivity of the detrusor to tension, and the expression of ryanodine receptor 2 (RyR2) was detected using Western blotting. Results FKBP12.6 knockout did not cause obvious changes in detrusor morphology, but aggravated the symptom of frequent urination in the mice. Compared with WT mice, the mice in KO group showed a significantly increased micturition frequency (43.500±19.164 vs 22.000±14.717 every 3 h, P < 0.05) with aggravated DO, significantly increased fluctuation frequency of bladder pressure during the urine storage period (13.900±5.430 vs 8.000±3.232 per 30 min, P < 0.05), and significantly increased sensitivity of the detrusors to tension (3.200±0.648 vs 1.200±0.245, P < 0.01). RyR2 expression in the detrusors decreased significantly in FKBP12.6 knockout mice as compared with the WT mice (0.154±0.106 vs 1.000±0.444, P < 0.01). Conclusion FKBP12.6 knockout results in aggravation of DO in mouse models possibly by down-regulation of RyR2 in the detrusors
What problem does this paper attempt to address?