A comparative study of optimization algorithm FFR-CT and invasive FFR
李长岭,冷晓畅,冯立,胡涛,张宇晨,胡新央,蒋峻,孙勇,姜文兵,潘轶斌,向建平,王建安
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.1671-0282.2020.12.021
2020-01-01
Abstract:Objective:To compare non-invasive coronary blood fractional flow reserve based on coronary CTA (FFR-CT) imaging with invasive coronary blood fractional flow reserve (FFR).Methods:Totally 47 patients (61 lesions) were retrospectively collected in this study, The FFR-CT value at each stenosis was calculated by AccuFFR
?ct (version 1.0, ArteryFlow Technology Co., Ltd.) and evaluated with accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV) and the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) , with FFR≤0.8 as the reference for the diagnosis of hemodynamically significant coronary stenosis.
Results:The accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV of AccuFFR
?ct versus invasive FFR were 91.5%, 88.2%, 93.3%, 88.2%, and 93.3% for the patient-level. The corresponding values for the vessel-level were 88.5%, 88.2%, 88.6%, 75% and 95.1%, respectively. There was a significant correlation between FFR-CT and invasive FFR (patient-level
r=0.71,
P<0.0001, and vessel-level
r=0.62,
P<0.0001, respectively), with AUC values of 0.89 and 0.90, respectively.
Conclusions:AccuFFR
?ct method based on coronary CTA imaging can be used as a fast and accurate tool to evaluate the functional significance due to coronary artery stenosis.