The curative effect observation and relevant factors analysis of the second generation TKI drugs after imatinib resistance or intolerance in chronic myeloid leukemia patients

安福润,杨明珍,曾庆曙,王永庆,葛健,王霖,阮敏,陈莹莹,顾悦
DOI: https://doi.org/10.19405/j.cnki.issn1000-1492.2015.08.023
2015-01-01
Abstract:Objective To observe the curative effect of second generation TKI drugs and analyze the influence of relevant factors in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) patients with imatinib resistance or intolerance. Methods The patients with Imatinib resistance or intolerance and had switched to the second generation TKI drugs, were se-lected randomly 25 each group. Then, monitored their BCR/ ABL fusion gene quantitative results in the 3rd month or 6th month, analyzed the relationship between achieving BCR/ ABL≤10% within 6 months and relevant factors, including the reason, phase and hematologic remission status while changing drug, and the adherence after the changing. Results There were 16 imatinib resistance patients (41. 0% ) and 9 Imatinib intolerance patients (81. 8% ) who had achieved BCR/ ABL≤10% within 6 months after changing. There were 23 patients(76. 7% ) in chronic phase (CP) and 2 patients(10. 0% ) in advanced phase(blastic phase BP or accelerated phase AP) while changing, who had achieved BCR/ ABL≤10% within 6 months. 16 patients(72. 7% ) had changed drug with complete hematologic remission (CHR) and 9 patients(32. 1% ) without CHR, then achieved BCR/ ABL≤10% within 6 months. 23 patients(74. 2% ) with good adherence of the second generation TKI drugs and 2 patients (10. 5% ) with bad adherence, had achieved BCR/ ABL≤10% within 6 months. Conclusion There is a certain effect on imatinib-resistant or intolerant CML patients who have switched to second-generation TKI drugs. And the difference between the efficacy of these two second-generation TKI drugs (Dasatinib, Nilotinib) is not statistically significant. The imatinib intolerance patients get better effect than the imatinib resistance patients. The patients in CP get better effect than the patients in advanced phase, while changing drug, the patients with CHR get better effect than the patients without CHR. The patients with good adherence of the second generation TKI drugs get bet-ter effect than the patients with bad adherence.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?