Mini-Nutritional Assessment and Short-Form Mini-Nutritional Assessment in evaluating nutritional status of the elderly in community

Huanhuan ZHANG,Cuiping WANG,Min ZHAO,Dongmei GUO,Liyong CHEN,Xinying LIN
DOI: https://doi.org/10.6040/j.issn.1671-7554.0.2017.107
2017-01-01
Abstract:Objective To compare the value of Mini-Nutritional Assessment ( MNA) and the Short-Form Mini-Nutri-tional Assessment ( MNA-SF) in evaluating the nutritional status of the elderly in community. Methods A total of 576 elderly≥60 years in Jinan City were randomly selected. MNA and MNA-SF were used to evaluate the nutritional status of the population. The anthropometric parameters and laboratory indexes were also measured. Results MNA took 10 min to complete while MNA-SF only needed 3 min. MNA showed that the proportion of adequate nutritional status was 79.93%, and that of potential malnutrition was 20.07%, and no malnutrition was found. MNA-SF showed that the pro-portion of adequate nutritional status was 80. 48% and that of malnutrition was 19. 52%. Both of them were positively correlated with BMI, MAC, CC, WC, HC, TSF, SSF, ALB and other traditional nutritional evaluation indicators ( r=0.001-0.530, P<0.05) . The Pearson correlation coefficient between MNA and MNA-SF scores was 0.823 ( P<0.05) . The Spearman correlation coefficient between MNA and MNA-SF was 0.681 ( P<0.05) . MNA and MNA-SF had good consistency in evaluating nutritional status (κ=0.681, P<0.001). With BMI<18.5 as the evaluation criteria of malnutrition, the sensitivity and specificity of MNA were 76.2% and 93.4% respectively, and the sensitivity and speci-ficity of MNA-SF were 93.4% and 100% respectively. Conclusion Both MNA and MNA-SF can be used to evaluate the nutritional status of elderly from community, and MNA-SF is more simple, rapid and effective.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?