Dynamic change and their diagnosis value of serum miR-101 and miR-25 in gastric cancer patients

Yaqin SONG,Wangrong WEN
DOI: https://doi.org/10.11778/j.jdxb.2016.03.014
2016-01-01
Abstract:Aim:To explore the expression of miR-1 01 and miR-25 in pre- and post-operative of pa-tients with gastric cancer and study their relationship with clinicopathologic features,to verify if it can be used as novel biomarkers for early diagnosis of gastric cancer.Methods:Relative expression of miR-1 01 and miR-25 in 58 gastric cancer patients’(31 paired of preoperative and postoperative serums from pa-tients with GC),30 patients with gastric precancerous diseases and 30 controls were detected by FQ-PCR.The expression differences of miR-1 01 and miR-25 between pre- and post-operative gastric cancer serum were compared.The relationship between miR-1 01 and miR-25 expression and clinicopathologieal characteristics in gastric cancer were analyzed.The operating characteristic curve (ROC)was made to de-termine whether there is clinical diagnostic value of miR-1 01 and miR-25 in gastric cancer serum.Re-sults:The expression of miR-1 01 in patients with gastric cancer serum was significantly lower than in nor-mal gastric (P<0. 01 )and gastric precancerous diseases(P<0. 01 ).The expression of miR-25 in gas-tric cancer patients’serum was significantly higher (P<0. 01 ).Furthermore,the expression levels of miR-1 01 was significantly increased in the postoperative samples when compared to the preoperative sam-ples (P=0. 007 ).ROC curve analysis showed higher diagnosis value of miR-1 01 and miR-25 in gastric cancer serum (miR-1 01:AUC =0. 857,sensitivity =0. 71 0,specificity =0. 881;miR-25:AUC =0. 821 ,sensitivity=0. 702,specificity =0. 800 ),The AUC value of gastric cancer were 0. 905 when combined miR-1 01 with miR-25 ,the sensitivity and specificity were 75. 9%and 86. 7%.Further analy-sis showed that low expression of miR-1 01 in gastric cancer serum were closely related to HP infection, expression levels of serum miR-1 01 with gastric HP infection in gastric cancer was significantly lower than that of uninfected ones (P=0. 01 2);it was significantly lower of miR-1 01 in gastric cancer serum with lymph node metastases than those without lymph node metastases (P=0. 033 );The low expression miR-1 01 in Gastric serum were significantly associated with lymph node metastasis (P=0. 033 )and clinical stage (P=0. 01 5 );The high expression miR-25 in Gastric serum were significantly associated with a high clinical stage (P=0. 01 8 )and lymph node metastasis (P<0. 001 ).Conclusion:miR-1 01 and miR-25 in serum might be a novel marker for evaluation of dynamic change in pre-and post-operative and early diagnosis of gastric cancer.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?