Abstract:Objective To estimate the applications of ADC value and rADC value in the diagnosis of nodular lesions of breasts.Methods Fifty-two cases with 66 nodular lesions of breasts confirmed by histopathology underwent diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging.Three b values (0,800 and 1000 s/mm2) were applied.The mean ADC values of the breast nodules,the ADC values of ipsilateral breast( rADC1 ) and ADC values of contralateral breast (rADC2 )were respectively measured.The independent-samples t-test and chi-square test were used for statistical analyses.Results Of the 52 patients,there were 18 patients with infiltrating ductal carcinoma and 34 patients with fibroadenoma.50 patients with 64 lesions were examined by DWI.( 1 ) at b = 800 s/mm2,the mean ADC values of malignant nodules [ ( 1.01 ±0.09) × 10-3 mm2/s],rADC800-1 (0.52 ±0.07)and rADC800-2 (0.51 ±0.06) were lower than that of the benign nodules [ ADC value = ( 1.54 ± 0.28 ) × 10 -3 mm2/s,t = 8.217,P ＜ 0.01 ; rADC800-1 =0.77 ±0.15,t =9.339,P＜0.01 ; rADC800-2 =0.76 ±0.14,t = 10.394,P ＜0.01 ].The one-side upper limits of 95％ medical reference value of mean values of infiltrating ductal carcinoma were adopted as the threshold point to distinguish the malignant from the benign.The threshold value of breast malignant nodule ADC,the rADC800-1 and rADC800-2 were respectively 1.05 × 10-3 mm2/s,0.55 and 0.53.The sensitivities of the three methods were 75.0％,65.0％ and 60.0％ ; the specificities were 100.0％,95.7％ and 97.8％ ;the positive predictive values were respectively 100.0％,86.7％ and 92.3％ ; the negative predictive values were 90.2％,86.3％ and 84.9％; the diagnosis accordance rates were respectively 92.4％,86.4％ and 86.4％.( 2 ) at b = 1000 s/mm2,the mean ADC values of malignant nodules [ ( 0.93 ± 0.08 ) ×10-3 mm2/s],rADC1000-1 (0.53 ±0.09) and rADC1000-2 (0.52 ±0.07) were also lower than that of the benign nodules[ ADC value= (1.45 ±0.28) ×10-3 mm2/s,t=11.844,P＜0.01; rADC1000-1 =0.75 ±0.16,t=5.820,P ＜ 0.01 ; rADC1000-2 = 0.74 ± 0.15,t = 8.082,P ＜ 0.01 ].The threshold value points breast malignant nodule ADC,the rADC1000-1 and rADC1000-2 were respectively 0.97 × 10-3 mm2/s,0.58,0.55.The sensitivities were all 70.0％ ; the specificities were respectively 100.0％,95.7％ and 93.5％ ;the positive predictive values were 100.0％,87.5％ and 82.4％ ; the negative predictive values were 88.5％,88.0％ and 87.8％ ; the diagnosis accordance rates were 90.9％,87.9％ and 86.5％ respectively.There were no significant differences in specificities and the diagnosis accordance rates ( x2 = 1.232,2.263 ; P =0.942,0.812 ).Conclusions ADC value and rADC value are both important parameters of MRI in differentiating benign and malignant breast diseases.The study indicated that ADC value ( at b =800 s/mm2) was the most valuable parameter.

Correlation of apparent diffusion coefficient with histopathological parameters in solitary pulmonary lesions and its diagnostic value

Diffusion-weighted MRI in Solitary Pulmonary Lesions: Associations Between Apparent Diffusion Coefficient and Multiple Histopathological Parameters.

Diffusion Weighted Imaging and Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Value in Differential Diagnosis of Lymph Node Lesions

The Diagnostic Role of Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Hypopharyngeal Carcinoma.

Correlation Between Magnetic Resonance Diffusion Weighted Imaging and Pathology in Lymphoma

Application Value of Apparent Diffusion Coefficient in Diagnosis of Different Histological Subtypes of Lung Cancers

Correlating Apparent Diffusion Coefficients with Histopathologic Findings on Meningiomas

Apparent diffusion coefficient values of diffusion-weighted imaging for distinguishing focal pulmonary lesions and characterizing the subtype of lung cancer: a meta-analysis

A Preliminary Study on Distinguishing Pulmonary Malignant Tumors from Solid Benign Lesions by Diffusion-weighted Imaging

Preliminary study on pathomechanism of non-small-cell lung carcinoma using apparent diffusion coefifcient

Relationship between apparent diffusion coefficient and tumour cellularity in lung cancer.

Evaluating Tumors and Tumorlike Lesions of the Nasal Cavity, the Paranasal Sinuses, and the Adjacent Skull Base With Diffusion-Weighted MRI

Application Value of MR Diffusion Weighted Imaging of Apparent Diffusion Coefficient in Diagnosis of Breast Nodular Lesions

Differentiating Laryngeal Carcinomas from Precursor Lesions by Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging at 3.0 T: a Preliminary Study.

Optimization of Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Measured by Diffusion-Weighted MRI for Diagnosis of Breast Lesions Presenting As Mass and Non-Mass-like Enhancement

Value of Apparent Diffusion Coefficient in the Differential Diagnosis of Small Round Cell Malignant Tumors of Nasal and Paranasal Sinus

Comparison of the MRI Diffusion Imaging and MSCT Diagnosis in the Solitary Pulmonary Solid Lesions

Role of apparent diffusion coefficients with diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in differentiating between benign and malignant bone tumors

MR diffusion-weighted imaging in differential diagnosis of breast lesions with different enhancement shapes or size and parameter selection

A Comparative Study in the Differential Diagnosis of Benign and Malignant Breast Diseases Using DWI Apparent Diffusion Coeffi-Cient and the Relative Apparent Diffusion Coefficient

Diagnostic value of ADC and rADC of diffusion weighted imaging in malignant breast lesions]