Direct Bypass Versus Indirect Bypass in Treating Adult Moyamoya: A Meta-Analysis

Yongyi QIU,Xiangyu MENG,Jincao CHEN,Jianjian ZHANG,Xiantao ZENG,Yi GUO
DOI: https://doi.org/10.14188/j.1671-8852.2017.0612
2018-01-01
Abstract:Objective:To objectively evaluate the efficacy and safety of direct bypass surgery and indirect bypass surgery for treating adult moyamoya disease.Methods:Databases such as Pubmed,Embase and Cochrane Central were searched from establishment to December 18,2016 through computer in order to look for articles comparing direct bypass with indirect bypass for treating adult MMD.The references of these articles were also searched by hand.After screening all the articles according to including and excluding criteria,two reviewers independently conducted the data extraction and assessment of the targeting articles.Meta-analyses were performed by using the RevMan 5.3 software.Results:Nine studies involving 478 patients were included.The results of meta-analyses showed that:①By the end of follow-up period,we saw a lower stroke incidence in the direct bypass group than in the indirect bypass group (odds ratio,0.59;95% confidence interval,0.21-1.60;P=0.30) without statistic differences.②By the end of follow-up period,the pooled OR of good revascularization in adult moyamoya angiopathy patients of the direct bypass group compared with the indirect bypass group was 8.08 (95% confidence interval,3.52-18.56;P<0.000 01),with significant statistic differences.③In our meta-analysis,to compare the hemodynamic improvement after direct bypass and indirect bypass,it indicated that the direct bypass was better with a OR of 2.10,95% confidence interval 0.26-17.16,P=0.49,though no statistic difference was suggested.④ During perioperative period,there was a slightly higher perioperative complication rate in the direct bypass group with an OR of 1.20,95 % confidence interval 0.47-3.06,P=0.70,however,no statistic difference was suggested.Conclusion:In treating adult MMD,direct bypass surgery can perform much better in angiographic revascularization than indirect bypass surgery does during follow-ups.In addition,direct bypass seems to act better in preventing future strokes than indirect bypass does,although no statistic difference was suggested.Due to the poor quality of original studies,a prudent choice is suggested.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?