Clinical Pharmacokinetics of Tacrolimus in Heart Transplantation Recipients

武国军,张波,袁建林,文爱东,陈宝琦,秦荣良,汤群辉,刘贺亮,王鹏飞,李欣,秦卫军,康福霞
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1009-7236.2002.02.017
2002-01-01
Abstract:AIM:To investigate the clinical pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus in heart transplantation recipients and to provide gist for clinical individual dosage. METHODS:When level of tacrolimus was in a steady state, the whole blood samples of the 4 heart transplant recipients were collected for 9 times in scheduled time during a τ. The whole blood concentrations of tacrolimus were analyzed by microparticle enzyme immunoassay (MEIA) before and after the administration of the medicine, the concentration-time data was fitted with the computer software package PKBP-N1, and the parameters of pharmacokinetics were calculated. The patients were given individual medication of tacrolimus according to the parameters of pharmacokinetics. The treatment window of tacrolimus was concluded by clinical curative effect and adverse drug reaction (ADR) of the patients. RESULTS: Compartmental analysis yielded a one-compartment open model in the steady state after oral administration of tacrolimus 4~5 mg/8 h. The mean pharmacokinetics parameters of tacrolimus were as follows: the Tmax = 1.2±0.4 h ,Cmax = 29±7 mg·L -1 , t 1/2 Ke = 7.6±1.2 h, AUC=275±108 mg·h -1 ·L -1 , respectively. The heart rejection and ADR of tacrolimus did not occur in 1 year after the operation when tacrolimus whole blood trough concentration was 25~5 mg·L -1 . CONCLUSION: The pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus was highly variable among patients. The whole blood trough concentration of tacrolimus should be monitored to ensure safety and efficacy. The range of therapeutic window trough levels of tacrolimus was 15~20 mg·L -1 within the first month, 10~15 mg·L -1 within the second and third months,8~12 mg·L -1 within the fourth to sixth months,5~8 mg·L -1 from the seventh month after the transplantation. This range of therapeutic window of tacrolimus was ideal for heart transplant recipients with less rejection and ADR.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?