[Diagnostic Value of Serum Pepsinogen Ⅰ/Pepsinogen Ⅱ Combined with Tumor Markers for Helicobacter pylori-Positive Early-Stage Gastric Cancer]
Shan-Shan Wang,Zhan-Ping Guo,Xiang-Yu Zhao
DOI: https://doi.org/10.12182/20230160111
Abstract:Objective: To investigate the diagnostic value of serum pepsinogen (PG) Ⅰ/PGⅡ combined with tumor markers for Helicobacter pylori ( Hp)-positive early-stage gastric cancer. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted with the clinical data of 109 patients with gastric cancer (the gastric cancer group), 115 patients with chronic atrophic gastritis (the benign group), 112 cases of low-grade intraepithelial neoplasia (the low grade group), 109 cases of high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia (the high grade group), and 104 healthy subjects who underwent the relevant screening tests as part of their general physical examination (the healthy group). All the subjects were admitted to or received care at our hospital between May 2018 and April 2021. The levels of serum PGⅠ, PGⅡ, carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), carbohydrate antigen 199 (CA199), and carbohydrate antigen 724 (CA724), and Hp infection status were examined. The findings for these indicators were compared among the groups, and the differences in serum indicators in Hp-positive and Hp-negative patients were compared. The diagnostic value of serum PGⅠ/PGⅡ combined with tumor markers for Hp-positive early-stage gastric cancer was assessed with receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Results: The serum levels of PGⅠ and PGⅠ/PGⅡ decreased in successive order in the healthy group, the benign group, the low grade group, the high grade group, and the gastric cancer group ( P<0.05). The serum levels of PGⅡ, CEA, CA199, and CA724 in the gastric cancer group, the high grade group, and the low grade group were all higher than those in the healthy group and the benign group ( P<0.05). The Hp-positive rates of the gastric cancer group, the high grade group, the low grade group and the benign group were higher than that of the healthy group ( P<0.01). The levels of serum PGⅠ, PGⅡ, CEA, CA199, and CA724 of the Hp-positive subjects of the healthy group, the benign group, the low grade group, the high grade group, and the gastric cancer group were higher than those of the Hp-negative subjects ( P<0.05), while their PGⅠ/PGⅡ levels were always lower than those of the Hp-negative persons ( P<0.05). The specificity and area under the curve ( AUC) of serum PGⅠ/PGⅡ, CEA, CA199, and CA724 in the combined diagnosis of Hp-positive early-stage gastric cancer were higher than those of each indicator used alone in diagnosis ( P<0.05). In the gastric cancer group, the proportion of patients with PGⅠ/PGⅡ>2.32 was lower in the Hp-positive patients than that in the Hp-negative patients ( P<0.05), while the proportions of patients with CEA>66.99 ng/mL, CA199>110.35 U/mL, and CA724>44.20 U/mL were higher in the Hp-positive patients than those in the Hp-negative patients ( P<0.05). Conclusion: Testing PGⅠ/PGⅡ in combination with CEA, CA199, and CA724 results in better diagnostic value for Hp-positive early-stage gastric cancer.