Efficacy and Safety of Intravenous Thrombolysis by Emergency Doctors in the Treatment of Ischemic Stroke

余剑波,黄文凤,朱继红,马晓路,陈文,赵礼婷

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1007-9572.2016.08.019

2016-01-01

Abstract:Objective To evaluate the safety and efficacy of intravenous rt-PA thrombolysis for patients with acute ischemic stroke ( AIS) by emergency physicians.Methods In this study, we enrolled 86 AIS patients who underwent rt-PA intravenous thrombolysis by emergency doctors from June 2013 to January 2015 in Peking University People′s Hospital, among which 66 patients received thrombolysis undertaken independently by emergency doctors and 20 patients received thrombolysis undertaken with the aid of doctors of neurology department.A retrospective analysis of patient characteristics, the temporal distribution of different treatment stages in hospital, prognosis of nervous system function, mortality and the incidence of bleeding of major organs was made.Results Among the 86 patients, the average dosage of rt-PA for each patient was 58.2mg.The average time of door to needle ( DTN) was 95 min, shorter than 116 minutes recorded in the Chinese National Stroke Registry by stroke unit staff.Average DTN time in the group of thrombolysis by emergency physicians was shorter than the group by doctors of neurology department 〔(87 ±37) min vs.(110 ±45) min〕.24 hour after thrombolysis, neurological functions of 56 patients (65.1%) were improved; 56 patients ( 65.1%) had a good outcome in nervous system function at discharge; 5 patients (5.8%) died, and bleeding of important organs occurred in 15 patients (17.4%).Conclusion Compared with the thrombolysis by doctors of neurology department, rt-PA thrombolysis by emergency physicians has better safety and similar risk for bleeding of important organs and death but reduces DTN time.