Petition Risk Assessment of Community First Diagnosis System in Chaoyang District of Beijing

Chun-hua LYU,Xiao-jun CHEN,Fei-heng YANG,Sheng-lan LIU,Na-na NI,Bao-hua LIU
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1007-9572.2016.25.003
2016-01-01
Abstract:Objective To evaluate the community petition risk of residents in Chaoyang District of Beijing. Methods According to the difference between the urban and rural areas,geographical locations,and distribution of intra - regional medical resources,8 community health service centers in Chaoyang District of Beijing from September to November 2O14 by purposive sampling method. 518 residents who were not patients were selected by convenient sampling method from these 8 community health service centers. Self - designed questionnaire was made to investigate the following main aspects of the residents:basic information,health status,community health services accessibility,whether community first diagnosis system was known or not,whether community first diagnosis system was accepted or not,and reasons for not accepting,see - a - doctor experience,&nbsp;cognition of importance of health services and suggestions of implementing community first diagnosis system. Results 511 valid questionnaires were collected;petition risk of the first diagnosis system of community residents was 43. 1% (22O / 511). The comparison of petition risk of community first diagnosis system of community among residents with different genders,ages, educational levels,family monthly income per person,annual health spending,types of medical insurance was not significantly different(P > O. O5);The comparison of petition risk of first diagnosis system of community among residents with different marital status was significantly different( P < O. O5). The comparison of petition risk of first diagnosis system of community among residents of different self - evaluated physical conditions,residents whether got sick in two weeks,and residents whether suffering from chronic was not significantly different( P > O. O5). There was no significant difference in petition risk of first diagnosis system of community among residents with different distances from their home to the nearest medical institutions(P >O. O5);there was significant difference in petition risk of first diagnosis system of community among residents with different walking times to the corresponding community health service institutions( P < O. O5 ) . The comparison of petition risk of community first diagnosis system of community among residents with different cognitions of this system was significantly different (P < O. O5). There was significant difference in petition risk of first diagnosis system of community among residents with different satisfaction degrees of comfort level of visiting doctors,medical equipments,medical environment,proportion of reimbursement and drug varieties(P < O. O5);there was no significant difference in petition risk of first diagnosis system of community among residents with different satisfaction degrees of service attitude, visiting time, distance from home, medical personnel′ s technological level,medical costs,drug costs,treatment effects(P > O. O5). The comparison of petition risk of first diagnosis system of community among residents with different cognitions of importance of traffic convenience was significantly different(P <O. O5);the comparison of petition risk of first diagnosis system of community among residents experiencing different service attitudes,comfort levels of diagnosis processes,visiting times,technological levels of medical personnel,medical equipments, medical environment,medical costs,drug costs,proportions of reimbursement,referral processes,degrees of familiarity with doctors,and treatment effects was not significantly different( P > O. O5) . Community residents believed that community′ s capacity building and service level needed to be improved,and referral system needed to be perfected. Conclusion The petition risk of community first diagnosis system in Chaoyang District is relatively high,and relevant policies and ability construction of community health service remains to be enhanced.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?