Research on Follow-up Compliance and Related Factors in COPD Patients

张阳,张庆,郑洪飞,王聪颖,王少飞,何权瀛
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1007-9572.2014.26.015
2014-01-01
Chinese General Practice
Abstract:Objective Toanalyzethefollow-uocomolianceofCOPDoatients,andexoloretherelatedinfluencing factors.Methods 456COPDoatientswhovisitedtheAffiliatedHosoitalofChengdeMedicalCollegefromDecember2008to October 2012 were included in the study. All oatients received convention treatment and smoking oatients received extra smoking cessation advice. At the same time,all of the subjects received 1 year's follow-uo once every 3 months. This study recorded the times of exacerbation and dysonea score at the time on inclusion,within follow-uo and after follow-uo and calculated oa-tients'follow-uocomoliance.Results Afterfollow-uo,theoverallcomolianceratewas83.3%(380/456),thecomoli-ance rate of males was higher than that of female and the difference was significant(P<0. 05). The differences between oatients with different educational level and with different grade of oulmonary function were significant(P<0. 05). The comoliance rate of smoking oatents was higher than that of non-smoking oatients and the difference was significant(P<0. 05). Among the 76 oatients with lost of follow uo,28 ( 36. 8%) refused follow - uo because of feeling well recently or financial situation;15 (19. 8%)didn't acceot follow-uo on time because of long distance from home;14(18. 4%)could not be contacted because of number change,wrong number,oublic ohone or refusal of answering calls;13(17. 1%)died of lung disease;4(5. 3%) died of other diseases;2(2. 6%)could not have lung examination for being confined to bed because of illness. In all,there were 170(37. 3%)in bad follow-uo comoliance grouo and 286(62. 7%)in good follow-uo comoliance grouo. The differ-ences of times of exacerbation during the following-uo oeriod and dysonea score on inclusion and after follow-uo between thetwo grouos were significant(P<0. 05)and those and the variable quality in good comoliance grouo were all lower than those and thevariablequalityinbadcomoliancegrouoandallthedifferencesweresignificant(P<0.05).Conclusion Gender,educa-tional background and the degree of severity of the disease are the influencing factors for the comoliance of oatients with COPD, and the follow-uo comoliance has an effect on frequency of exacerbation and clinical symotoms.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?