Abstract:Objective: To analyze the application effect of continuous lumbar cistern fluid drainage combined with decompressive craniectomy in the treatment of severe craniocerebral injury. Methods: A total of 87 patients with severe craniocerebral injury admitted to our hospital between March 2016 and March 2021 were retrospectively enrolled. They were divided into two groups according to the decompression methods applied, with 42 patients who received standard decompressive craniectomy assigned to the control group and 45 patients who received continuous lumbar cistern fluid drainage combined with standard decompressive craniectomy assigned to the observation group. The primary indicators that were monitored and compared between the two group included the amount of time for patient CT imaging to be clear of subarachnoid hemorrhage, the length-of-stay, the duration of post-operative intubation, the mannitol dose, scores for Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS), prognosis, the incidence of cerebral edema and cerebral infarction, and complications. The secondary indicators that were monitored and compared included intracranial pressure, cerebrospinal fluid antinucleosome protein SP100, and red blood cell count of the two groups before treatment and after continuous drainage for 7 days. Results: The amount of time for CT imaging to be clear of subarachnoid hemorrhage and the length-of-stay of the observation group were shorter than those of the control group, the mannitol dose of the observation group was lower than that of the control group, the incidence of cerebral edema and the incidence of complications of the observation group were lower than those of the control group, and the rate of patients with good prognosis in the observation group was higher than that in the control group ( P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the rate of poor prognosis or mortality between the two groups ( P>0.05). The duration of postoperative intubation of the observation group was (8.24±1.09) d, while that of the control group was (9.22±1.26) d, and the difference between the two groups was statistically significant ( t=3.887, P<0.05). There were 2 cases (4.44%) of cerebral infarction in the observation group, with the infarct volume being (8.36±1.87) cm 3, while there were 9 cases (21.43%) of cerebral infarction in the control group, with the infarct volume being (8.36±1.87) cm 3, and there were statistically significant differences in the incidence and volume of cerebral infarction between the two groups ( χ 2=5.674, t=9.609, P<0.05). After treatment, the intracranial pressure and red blood cell count decreased in both groups and the intracranial pressure, cerebrospinal fluid SP100, and red blood cell count of the observation group were significantly lower than those of the control group ( P<0.05). The cerebrospinal fluid SP100 of the observation group decreased after treatment in comparison with the level before treatment ( P<0.05), while the pre- and post-treatment levels of the control group did not demonstrate any significant difference. Conclusion: Continuous lumbar cistern fluid drainage in patients with severe craniocerebral injury effectively shortens the time required for the body to recover, significantly reduces the level of intracranial pressure, improves the levels of cerebral edema and cerebral infarction, and has a high degree of safety for prognosis and recovery.

Clinical Observation of External Ventricular Drainage Combined with Lumbar Cistern Drainage in Treatment of Patients with Hypertensive Intraventricular Hemorrhage

Unique Cerebrospinal Fluid Profiles of Patients With Human Immunodeficiency Virus- Associated Cryptococcal Meningitis With a Ventriculoperitoneal Shunt : A Retrospective Cohort Study

External Ventricular Drains Versus Intraparenchymal Intracranial Pressure Monitors in Traumatic Brain Injury: A Prospective Observational Study

A clinical study of high-dose urokinase for the treatment of the patients with hypertension induced ventricular hemorrhage

Prognosis effect of intracranial hypertension in different types of cerebrospinal fluid drainage patients with AIDS merged with cryptococcal meningitis

Influence on curative effect and blood brain barrier function of minimally invasive puncture drainage in treatment of patients with hypertensive intra-cerebral hemorrhage

Which Side of Lateral Ventricles to Choose During External Ventricular Drainage in Patients with Intraventricular Hemorrhage: Ipsilateral or Contralateral?

Therapeutic lumbar puncture and lumbar drainage: which is more effective for the management of intracranial hypertension in HIV patients with cryptococcal meningitis? Results of a prospective non-randomized interventional study in China

Comparison Between Endoscopy and Conventional Drainage Operations in Treatment of 66 Cases with Hypertensive Intraventricuar Hemorrhage

Ventriculo peritoneal shunt for intracranial hypertension in HIV-associated cryptococcus meningitis

122 Use of Automated Active and Continuous CSF Irrigation and Drainage for Treatment of Intraventricular Hemorrhage a Retrospective Comparative Study With Volumetric Analysis

Clinical Observation on Ventriculoperitoneal Shunt in the Treatment of Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus

A new protocol to treat moderate to severe intraventricular hemorrhage with obstructive hydrocephalus.

Effectiveness Observation of Sequential Hemodialysis without Heparinum in Treatment of Uremia Complicated by In-tracerebral Hemorrhage

Application of the Ommaya reservoir in managing ventricular hemorrhage

Safety and Efficacy of Extra-Ventricular Drainage Combined with Urokinase Administration in the Management of Intraventricular Hemorrhage.

Effect of Robot-Assisted Neuroendoscopic Hematoma Evacuation Combined Intracranial Pressure Monitoring for the Treatment of Hypertensive Intracerebral Hemorrhage

The Use of Ventriculoperitoneal Shunts for Uncontrollable Intracranial Hypertension in Patients with Hiv-Associated Cryptococcal Meningitis with or Without Hydrocephalus

Clinical observation of small volume replacement of cerebrospinal fluid in the treatment of acute subarachnoid hemorrhage

[Application Effect of Continuous Lumbar Cistern Fluid Drainage Combined With Decompressive Craniectomy in the Treatment of Severe Craniocerebral Injury]

Tre Atment Strategy of Hydrocephalus Associated with Intracranial Infection