Abstract:Background: Although posterior medial meniscal root (PMMR) repairs are often successful, postoperative meniscal extrusion after a root repair has been identified as a potential clinical problem. Purpose/hypothesis: The purpose was to quantitatively evaluate the tibiofemoral contact mechanics and extent of meniscal extrusion after a PMMR repair. It was hypothesized that the addition of a centralization suture (into the posterior medial tibial plateau) would help restore normal joint load-bearing characteristics and restore the native amount of meniscal extrusion after a root tear. Furthermore, we hypothesized that the amount of meniscal extrusion would be greatest in loaded and flexed knees when measured at the posterior border of the medial collateral ligament (MCL). Study design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: Meniscal extrusion and tibiofemoral contact mechanics were measured using 3-dimensional digitization and pressure sensors in 10 nonpaired, human cadaveric knees. The PMMR of each knee was tested under 6 states: (1) intact; (2) type 2A PMMR tear; (3) anatomic transtibial pull-out root repair; (4) anatomic transtibial pull-out repair with centralization; (5) nonanatomic transtibial pull-out repair; and (6) nonanatomic transtibial pull-out repair with centralization, with randomization of the order of conditions 3 and 4, and 5 and 6. The testing protocol loaded knees with a 1000-N axial compressive force at 4 flexion angles (0°, 30°, 60°, 90°) in each state. Meniscal extrusion was measured with a 3-dimensional coordinate digitizer at 0° and 90° in both the loaded and unloaded states and calculated from the difference from the articular margin of the tibia to the periphery of the meniscus. Peak contact pressure, contact area, and total contact pressure were also recorded for all states at all flexion angles. Statistical analysis investigated the independent effects of flexion, state, and loading using 3 distinct 2-factor models. Results: Differences in the contact mechanics between repair techniques were most notable at higher flexion angles, demonstrating significantly higher average and peak contact pressures for nonanatomic repair states when compared with anatomic repairs with and without centralization (all P < .05). In unloaded knees at full extension, the magnitude of medial meniscal extrusion was significantly higher at the posterior border of the MCL compared with the posterior medial tibia ( P < .001) and adjacent to the root attachment on the tibia locations ( P < .001). Both anatomic repair states had no significant difference in the degree of extrusion when compared with the intact state. Conclusion: The anatomic transtibial pull-out root repair and the anatomic transtibial pull-out root repair with centralization techniques best restored contact mechanics of the knee and meniscal extrusion when compared with root tear and nonanatomic repair states at time zero. There were no significant differences in contact pressure or magnitude of extrusion between the anatomic repair state and the anatomic repair with centralization state. We found that extrusion is best measured in the coronal plane at the posterior border of the MCL for unloaded knees. However, the degree of extrusion increased as the knee was loaded and flexed to 90°. Clinical relevance: When there are concerns about meniscal extrusion with a medial meniscal root repair, the addition of a centralization suture may be beneficial for patients in reducing pathologic meniscal extrusion and restoring joint contact mechanics.

Biomechanical effect of meniscal repair and partial meniscectomy on contact mechanics

Contact mechanics after mattress suture repair of medial meniscus vertical longitudinal tear: an in vitro study

The effects of different repair methods for a posterior root tear of the lateral meniscus on the biomechanics of the knee: a finite element analysis

The Effect of Meniscal Tears and Resultant Partial Meniscectomies on the Knee Contact Stresses: a Finite Element Analysis

Effect of partial and complete posterior cruciate ligament transection on medial meniscus: A biomechanical evaluation in a cadaveric model.

Tibiofemoral Contact Mechanics After Horizontal Or Ripstop Suture In Inside-Out And Transtibial Repair For Meniscus Radial Tears In A Porcine Model

H-Plasty Repair Technique Improved Tibiofemoral Contact Mechanics after Repair for Adjacent Radial Tears of Posterior Lateral Meniscus Root: A Biomechanical Study.

Biomechanical Effects of the Medial Meniscus Horizontal Tear and the Resection Strategy on the Rabbit Knee Joint under Resting State: Finite Element Analysis.

Biomechanical evaluation of the effect of arthroscopic suture passing instruments on the posterior meniscal root

Articular contact pressures of meniscal repair techniques at various knee flexion angles

Biomechanical analysis of four different meniscus suturing techniques for posterior meniscal root pull-out repair: A human cadaveric study

Effect of Degenerative and Radial Tears of the Meniscus and Resultant Meniscectomy on the Knee Joint: a Finite Element Analysis

Utilization of Transtibial Centralization Suture Best Minimizes Extrusion and Restores Tibiofemoral Contact Mechanics for Anatomic Medial Meniscal Root Repairs in a Cadaveric Model

Biomechanical Analysis of the Effect of Medial Meniscus Degenerative and Traumatic Lesions on the Knee Joint.

The effect of medial meniscal horn injury on knee stability

Biomechanical Comparison Between Suture Anchor and Transtibial Pull-out Repair for Posterior Medial Meniscus Root Tears

EFFECTS OF MENISCECTOMY ON THE CONTACT CHARACTERISTIC OF THE TIBIOFEMORAL JOINT AT DIFFERENT FLEXION ANGLES

Mechanical properties of soft tissue in tibiofemoral joint after partial meniscectomy of lateral meniscus

Clinical effects and methods of arthroscopic repair of meniscal tear by tendon suture

Biomechanical properties under cyclic loading of seven meniscus repair techniques

Intra-Articular Biomechanical Changes of the Meniscus and Ligaments During Stance Phase of Gait Circle after Different Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Surgical Procedures: A Finite Element Analysis