Effects of Damage Control Surgery on Systemic Inflammatory Response and Early Mortality in a Pig Model of Severe Abdominal Gunshot Injury
Y. Li,P. Wang,Q. Mao,J. Wang,J. Li
2012-01-01
Shock
Abstract:Objective To compare the difference in systemic inflammatory response and early mortality between damage control surgery(DCS) and the traditional surgery in a pig model of severe abdominal gunshot injury.Methods Thirty-two female domestic outbreeding pigs with multiple bowel injury and exsanguination followed by lethal triad(low body temperature,acidosis and coagulopathy) were randomly divided into two groups(16 each): conventional surgery(CS) and DCS groups.Laparotomy was performed after transfusion of appropriate amount of autologous blood and fluid infusion,pigs in CS group were then underwent end-to-end intestinal anastomosis,peritoneal lavage and definitive abdominal closure;while in DCS group the pigs received clamping of intestinal lumens,ligation of bleeding vessels,peritoneal lavage,and temporary abdominal closure.The operation time,blood loss and volume of fluid infusion were recorded.The hemodynamic parameters,arterial blood gases and coagulation parameters were examined.Six pigs of each group were sacrificed 6 hours after operation,and myocardium,lung,small intestine and liver were harvested for histological observation.The remaining 10 pigs of each group were used for assessment of 24h survival rate.Results No significant difference was detected in blood loss and mean arterial pressure(MAP) between the two groups.Compared with CS group,the operation time in DCS group was shorter(1.1±0.2h vs 2.4±0.3h,P < 0.01),and the amount of infusion was less(3204±254ml vs 3756±313ml,P < 0.05).Pigs in DCS group showed higher urinary output,lower heart rate,and lower dagree of acidosis and coagulopathy.The tissue injuries and neutrophil infiltration were milder in DCS group than in CS group.Although the 24h survival rate was higher in DCS group(80%) than in CS group(50%),no significant difference was found with statistical analysis(P=0.175).Conclusion Damage control surgery,compared with conventional surgery,may shorten the operation time,reduce fluid infusion,accelerate correction of metabolic acidosis,coagulopathy and hypothermia,avoid aggravation of accessory injuries and systemic inflammatory response induced by reperfusion,and prevent multiple organs dysfunction syndrome(MODS).