A Study of the Anticonvulsive Effects Between Living Rhino Horn and Rhino Horn

冯润东,曹蕾,刘蕊,宋冰雪,刘静,曹永孝
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1009-6469.2015.12.010
2015-01-01
Abstract:Objective To study of the anticonvulsive effects between living Rhino Horn and Rhino Horn and to explore whether living Rhino Horn could be used as a substitute of Rhino Horn.Methods The 280 mice were randomly divided into four groups of living Rhino Horn (700、350、175、90 mg· kg-1), four groups of Rhino Horn (700、350、175、90 mg· kg-1),a blank control group and a positive group of diazepam.The mice were gavaged with the corresponding dose of test sample for 2 consecutive days.Thirty minutes after last gavaged,the autonomic activeties of 20 mice in every group were records by the independent event recorder.The other 15 mice in every group were induced convulsion by Nikethamide.And then, it was recorded that the time of convulsion and the time of death of the mice.Results Independent activities and anticonvulsants, according to the results of Rhino Horn, living Rhino Horn could be have excitation on the mice of blank control group.Live Rhino Horn (700、350、175、90 mg· kg-1)and Rhino Horn (350、175、90 mg · kg-1 ) could significantly reduce the incidence of eclampsia and/or mortality of the mice, and there was no significant difference be-tween live Rhino Horn and Rhino Horn with the same dose (350、175、90 mg· kg-1 ) .Conclusion Under the condition of this exper-iment,It was estimated preliminarily that the anticonvulsive effect of living Rhino Horn at a dosage of 350、175、90 mg· kg-1 was equal to the anticonvulsive effect of the traditional Rhino Horn, and then the living Rhino Horn could be used as a substitute of Rhino Horn.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?