Comparison of the Effects of Intrathecal Levobupivacaine and Bupivacaine for Caesarean Section

ZHAO Xin-min,TANG Xiu-chen,SONG Zheng-liang,LU Qiao-yun,DUAN Man-lin
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1008-8199.2011.12.013
2011-01-01
Abstract:Objective It has been controversial whether bupivacaine can be replaced by levobupivacaine.This study aimed to compare intrathecal bupivacaine and levobupivacaine in achieving analgesia,muscular relaxation and postoperative pain control in patients undergoing Caesarean section.Methods We used a combined spinal-epidural technique for 90 parturients undergoing Caesarean section,who were randomly assigned to receive levobupivacaine 10 mg(n=45) and bupivacaine 10 mg(n=45).We recorded the upper sensory block level,sensory and motor recovery time,the degree of muscle relaxation,and the mean arterial pressure(MAP) and heart rate(HR) at 1,3,5,7,10 and 15 min after intrathecal administration.Results The maximum levels of sensory block in the levobupivacaine and bupivacaine groups were T6(T10-4) and T9(T10-4)(P0.05),the motor block onset times were(2.0±0.2) and(2.0±0.1) min(P0.05),the times to the maximum level of sensory block were(6.5±2.2) and(7.0±2.1) min(P0.05),the times of sense recovery were(180.2±12.1) and(246.1±14.4) min(P0.01),and the times of motor recovery were(150.1±18.4) and(167.2±22.1) min(P0.01).No statistically significant differences were found either in the degree of muscle relaxation between the two groups(P0.05) or in MAP and HR at 1,3,5,7,10 and 15 min after intrathecal administration(P0.05).Conclusion Bupivacaine remains an appropriate choice for spinal anesthesia in Caesarean sections.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?