Abstract:Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has become the standard of care for the treatment of severe aortic stenosis in individuals who are at prohibitive surgical risk and presents a viable alternative to surgery in selected patients who are at high operative risk. To date, outcomes from the PARTNER (Placement of AoRtic TraNscathetER Valve) and Medtronic CoreValve® US Pivotal trials continue to show the benefits of TAVR in these high-risk subgroups out to 5 and 3 years, respectively (as reported by Mack et al. Lancet. 85:2477-2484 2015; Kapadia et al. Lancet. 385:2485-2491 2015; Deeb et al. J Am Coll Cardiol. 67:2565-2574 2016). Furthermore, the recent release of the PARTNER-2 and SURTAVI trial results among other international data suggest that clinical outcomes for intermediate risk patients may be promising for TAVR compared to surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) (as reported by Leon et al. N Engl J Med. 374:1609-1620 2016; Reardon et al. N Engl J Med. 376:1321-1331 2017). However, several questions persist regarding TAVR-specific complications as well as long-term durability. Paravalvular regurgitation, permanent pacemaker implantation, stroke, vascular access injury, and renal failure in post-TAVR patients remain adversaries in the quest to perfect this groundbreaking, game-changing technology (as reported by Khatri et al. Ann Intern Med. 158:35-46 2013). In this review, we provide an up-to-date synopsis of results from landmark clinical trials that cumulatively attest to the comparability of TAVR to best medical therapy and SAVR in extreme-risk, high-risk, and intermediate-risk patient populations. We continue with a review of studies that seek to compare transcatheter vs. surgical valve implantation in lower-risk subgroups. We also introduce ongoing efforts to optimize the peri-procedural management of TAVR and conclude with a presentation of management strategies and new generation valve platforms that seek to address some of the current limitations of transcatheter valve implantation.

Advances in minimalist transcatheter aortic valve replacement

Economics of Minimalist Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: Results From the 3M-TAVR Economic Study

Expansion of indications for transcatheter aortic valve replacement

Complications in transcatheter aortic valve replacement: A comprehensive analysis and management strategies

Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement is Ready for Most Low-risk Patients: A Systematic Review of the Literature

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement: Past, present, and future

The best way to transcatheter aortic valve implantation: From standard to new approaches

Challenges and future opportunities for transcatheter aortic valve therapy

Computational study of transcatheter aortic valve replacement based on patient-specific models—rapid surgical planning for self-expanding valves

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI): state of the art techniques and future perspectives

An Analysis Regarding the Article: Insight Into the Optimal Timing of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention and Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement

Current issues in transcatheter aortic valve replacement

Recent developments and controversies in transcatheter aortic valve implantation

Update of Transcatheter Valve Treatment

Exploring Optimal Strategies for Surgical Access in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation

Comparative efficacy of totally thoracoscopic, mini-thoracotomy, and mini-sternotomy approaches in aortic valve replacement

Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement for Bicuspid Vs. Tricuspid Aortic Stenosis among Patients at Low Surgical Risk in China: from the Multicenter National NTCVR Database

Clinical considerations and challenges in TAV-in-TAV procedures

An Updated Comprehensive Review of Existing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Access

Engineering perspective on transcatheter aortic valve implantation

Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: Outcomes, Indications, Complications, and Innovations