An investigation of blood transfusion rationality and early hemoglobin level in elderly patients undergoing hip replacement

Shuo-zeng DENG,Jing LUO,Jin-hua ZHANG,Fu-wang HAN
DOI: https://doi.org/10.12037/YXQY.2018.02-17
2018-01-01
Abstract:Objective To investigate the rationality of the hip replacement blood transfusion, so as to accumulate experiences for patients blood management. Method 30 cases of elderly patients undergoing unilateral hip replacement from January 2016 to March 2017 in our hospital were selected as the subjects, they had operated on artificial femoral head replacement under spinal-epidural anesthesia. Intraoperative blood salvage was routinely used and autologous red blood cels (RBCs) were returned back to all patients following surgery. The blood transfusion trigger of allogeneic RBCs and unite numbers was decided by the orthopedic surgeon. According to 24h postoperative hemoglobin (Hb) measurement, the rationality of transfusion was classified by the anesthesiologist into zero transfusion group (bloodless surgery), reasonable transfusion group (Hb 80 ~ 100 g/L), unreasonable transfusion group (Hb > 100 g/L). The preoperative hemoglobin level, intraoperative autologus RBCs recovery volume, allogeneic RBCs transfusion unites and 24h postoperative incision drainage volume and 24h postoperative Hb level were measured among the three groups, respectively. Result There were 10 cases (33%) in zero transfusion group, 14 cases (47%) in reasonable transfusion group and 6 cases (20%) in unreasonable group. There were no significient differences in intraoperative autologus RBCs recovery volume and 24h postoperative incision drainage volume among the three groups (P>0.05). The result showed that age in zero transfusion group were significant lower than those of reasonable group and unreasonable group (P<0.01, P<0.05), respectively. The preoperative and 24h postoperative Hb level in zero transfusion group were all significant higher than those in reasonable group (P<0.01). The preoperative and 24h postoperative Hb level in unreasonable group were also significant higher than those in reasonable group (P<0.05, P<0.01). Conclusion It is concluded that postoperative Hb>80 g/L is a safe level. Early postoperative Hb measurement can help us to assess the rationality of blood transfusion.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?