Effects of general anesthesia and spinal anesthesia on the early prognosis of patients after hip replacement

周冬娜,裴大庆,周大春
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn112137-20191220-02787
2020-01-01
Abstract:Objective:To investigate the effects of general anesthesia or spinal anesthesia on the early prognosis of patients after hip replacement.Methods:A retrospective analysis of 261 patients who underwent hip arthroplasty under general anesthesia or spinal anesthesia from July 2015 to June 2019 was divided into two groups according to the anesthesia method adopted for surgery: General anesthesia group (group G, n=179) and Spinal anesthesia group (group S, n=82). Propensity score matching analysis with preset caliper width was used. 76 pairs of patient data were successfully matched, with 38 cases in each group. General information and important biochemical indicators of patients before surgery were corrected. Comparison of anesthesia time, operation time, intraoperative bleeding volume, blood transfusion volume, length of hospital stay, whether to stay in intensive care unit, lung infection, incision infection, urinary tract infection, deep vein thrombosis, unplanned reintubation, death in the hospital and other information. Results:After the propensity values were matched, the number of hospital stays in the group G and group S were (24±7) and (23±6) days, repectively, with no significant difference ( t=0.691, P>0.05). The incidence of admission to the intensive care unit was 26.3% and 7.9%, compared with group G, the rate of patients admission to the intensive care unit was lower in the group S (χ 2=4.547, P<0.05). There were no statistical differences of other indicators between the two groups (all P>0.05). Conclusion:General anesthesia and spial anesthsesia have no significant difference in early prognosis of patients after hip replacement. Spinal anesthesia may associated with less intensive care unit stay after operation.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?