Characteristic of slow wave activity in electroencephalogram during overnight sleep in patients with obstructive sleep apnea

植少坚,任蓉,雷飞,李桃美,谭璐,张艳艳,张烨,唐向东
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn112137-20200227-00472
2020-01-01
Abstract:Objective:To characterize electroencephalogram (EEG) power in different frequency bands, particularly in overnight distribution of slow wave activity (SWA) in patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA).Methods:Seventy-seven subjects [31 males and 46 females, aged (55.3±5.2) years] with primary complaint of snoring from Sleep Medicine Center of West China Hospital were included in the study. All subjects underwent one night polysomnography (PSG). The subjects were divided into four groups based on the apnea hypopnea index (AHI): primary snoring (AHI<5 times/h), mild OSA (5 times/h ≤ AHI <15 times/h), moderate OSA (15 times/h ≤ AHI <30 times/h), and severe OSA (AHI ≥30 times/h). The absolute EEG power values across five frequency bands during overnight sleep, during non-rapid eye movement (NREM) and rapid eye movement (REM) sleep periods were initially compared across four groups. Afterwards, the relative SWA values over four NREM cycles during overnight records were compared across four groups, and the correlation between SWA and AHI, Epworth sleepiness scale (ESS) score was analyzed among all subjects.Results:For overnight analysis, SWA in the moderate and severe OSA groups was lower than that in the mild OSA and primary snoring groups during total sleep, NREM and REM periods[total sleep: (120.3±49.4), (125.6±65.5) vs (147.1±68.3), (163.1±66.7) μV 2; NREM period: (143.9±60.0), (146.6±77.1) vs (173.6±79.8), (193.7±82.4) μV 2; REM period: (39.9±14.7), (41.4±13.1) vs (48.4±20.8), (52.6±21.7) μV 2], but did not reach the significant level (all P>0.05). Four groups showed decreased patterns in relative SWA values from the first NREM cycle to the fourth NREM cycle. The relative SWA had significant difference among four NREM cycles in the primary snoring group, mild and moderate OSA groups (all P<0.001). In the severe OSA group, the relative SWA in four NREM cycles respectively was (156.5±0.5)%, (149.6±0.4)%, (135.1±0.4)%, (121.7±0.4)% ( P=0.053). The relative SWA in the severe OSA group was higher than that in the mild OSA group in the fourth NREM cycle [(85.5±0.3)% vs (121.7±0.4)%] ( P=0.004). SWA in 1 st NREM cycle was negatively correlated with ESS score ( r=-0.239, P=0.043), no correlation was found between overnight SWA, SWA in NREM period, SWA in REM period, SWA in four NREM cycles and AHI ( r=-0.095, -0.092, -0.174, -0.161, -0.089, -0.024, -0.115, all P>0.05). Conclusions:The results suggest that SWA in OSA patients has internal stability and is related to daytime sleepiness. SWA is a potential predictor of daytime sleepiness in OSA patients. When SWA is used as a clinical indicator of sleep quality, attention should be paid to the dynamic analysis and its periodic changes.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?