Systematic evaluation of different chemotherapy regimens for patients with advanced gastric cancer

Wei LI,Han YAN,Jian-hong HUANG,Yi ZHANG,Xiao-jun HU,Bang-wei CAO
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1003-6350.2016.08.048
2016-01-01
Abstract:Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety of Docetaxel versus Epirubicin for advanced gastric cancer. Methods CNKI, Wanfang database, VIP, PubMed, Embase were searched for relative randomized controlled trials (RCT) of treating advanced gastric cancer with Docetaxel or Epirubicin regimen. The retrieved literatures were screened and evaluated by Jadad score criteria. Stata12.0 was used for statistical analysis and forest plots. The efficacy and safety indicators such as overall response rate, hematological toxicity, neurotoxicity and gastrointestinal toxicity were evaluated systematically. Results In aspect of efficacy, the overall response rate for Docetaxel regimen was signif-icantly higher than that for Epirubicin regimen group (RR=1.24, 95%CI:1.03~1.49). In terms of safety, the incidence of neurotoxicity for Docetaxel regimen was significantly higher than that for Epirubicin regimen (RR=3.92, 95%CI:1.31~11.69), but the incidence of thrombocytopenia for Docetaxel regimen was significantly lower than that for Epirubicin reg-imen (RR=0.69, 95%CI:0.50~0.95). There was no statistically significant difference between the two regiments in the in-cidences of leucopenia, anemia, nausea and vomiting. Conclusion The overall response rate for Docetaxel regimen is significantly higher than that for epirubicin regimen in the treatment of advanced gastric cancer.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?